Intuitive explanation for P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B)

  • Thread starter Thread starter physio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why the probability of the union of two disjoint sets A and B, denoted as P(A U B), equals the sum of their individual probabilities, P(A) + P(B). Participants clarify that since A and B cannot occur simultaneously, their probabilities can simply be added without overlap. An example involving a die illustrates this concept, showing how the probabilities of rolling an odd number and rolling a four can be combined. The intuitive understanding is reinforced by visualizing events as shapes in Venn diagrams, where disjoint events do not intersect. Overall, the explanation emphasizes the simplicity of adding probabilities for disjoint events.
physio
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am unsure as to why the probability of A U B = P(A) + P(B) for sets A and B being disjoint. Why do we add the two probabilities? Is it because the sample space remains the same but now we add the numerators as the number of events have increased and that is why we are adding the two?? Can anyone give me a good intuitive explanation? I tried solving the problem myself but I cannot figure out how to arrive at the answer. An intuitive explanation will really help. Thanks in advance for your answers!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
physio said:
Hello,

I am unsure as to why the probability of A U B = P(A) + P(B) for sets A and B being disjoint. Why do we add the two probabilities? Is it because the sample space remains the same but now we add the numerators as the number of events have increased and that is why we are adding the two?? Can anyone give me a good intuitive explanation? I tried solving the problem myself but I cannot figure out how to arrive at the answer. An intuitive explanation will really help. Thanks in advance for your answers!

What reason do you have to doubt this? It's difficult to know how to explain this unless you can describe what you see as the probability of two disjoint events? Let's take an example:

The probablity a die comes up odd is 1/2. And the probability it comes up 4 is 1/6. So, the probability it is either odd or 4 is 1/2 + 1/6 = 2/3.

What do you think it should be?
 
Thank you for your answer. I think I understand now. Please do let me know if my explanation is correct. In your example, we are adding the two events (it is odd and number is 4) and grouping them as a single event and hence it is addition. Moreover, the sample space remains the same i.e. 6 alternatives possible. This also brings me to the conclusion that we have to subtract the element counted more than once. Thanks! Do let me know.
 
physio said:
Thank you for your answer. I think I understand now. Please do let me know if my explanation is correct. In your example, we are adding the two events (it is odd and number is 4) and grouping them as a single event and hence it is addition. Moreover, the sample space remains the same i.e. 6 alternatives possible. This also brings me to the conclusion that we have to subtract the element counted more than once. Thanks! Do let me know.

As you may know, in general:

##P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B)##

Perhaps the simplest way is to think of events as shapes and the probability as the area of the shape and use Venn diagrams.

In the special case where ##A## and ##B## are disjoint (which means they can't both happen), then ##P(A \cap B) = 0##

I would tend to think of this in terms of simple examples (like coins, dice and cards) and then abstract that inituitive understanding into the abstract notation of sample spaces and events.
 
@PeroK : Thank you for your explanation. Got me to realize why P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B)!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top