Invariants of the stress tensor (von Mises yield criterion)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the von Mises yield criterion and the confusion surrounding the second stress invariant's sign in two equations. Participants note that the I invariants are derived from the characteristic polynomial of the stress tensor, which can lead to differing sign conventions based on the equation's formulation. Clarification is provided that J2 and I2 should not be confused, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between them. The equations presented highlight the mathematical relationship between the stress components and their contributions to the invariant. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately applying the yield criterion in material science.
balasekar1005
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I see different versions of the second invariant of the cauchy stress tensor.
Hello all,

I am trying to understand the von Mises yield criterion and stumbled across two equations for the second stress invariant. Although the only difference is a difference in signs (negative and positive), it has been bothering me. Attached are the two versions. Which one is correct and if both are correct, why is there a change in sign?

Thank you,
Bala
 

Attachments

  • wiki.PNG
    wiki.PNG
    297 bytes · Views: 252
  • othersource.PNG
    othersource.PNG
    311 bytes · Views: 246
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have not done theoretical stuff in a long time, so take what I say with a grain of salt ...

The I invariants are the constants of the characteristic polynomial of the stress tensor used to determine the principal stresses so that you can define them to within a sign depending on how you choose to write the equation. What I cannot remember, is if there is a sign convention. Since you are finding both, my guess is that there is not one.

BTW, make sure that you do not confuse J2 with I2.
 
Here's what I've found in one of the books:
$$II_{\sigma}=\frac{1}{2} \left[ tr(\sigma^{2})-(tr \sigma)^2 \right]=- \sigma_{11} \sigma_{22}+ \sigma_{12} \sigma_{21} - \sigma_{11} \sigma_{33} + \sigma_{13} \sigma_{31} - \sigma_{22} \sigma_{33} + \sigma_{23} \sigma_{32}$$
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
977
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
753