Invariants of the stress tensor (von Mises yield criterion)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the von Mises yield criterion and the confusion surrounding the second stress invariant's sign in two equations. Participants note that the I invariants are derived from the characteristic polynomial of the stress tensor, which can lead to differing sign conventions based on the equation's formulation. Clarification is provided that J2 and I2 should not be confused, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between them. The equations presented highlight the mathematical relationship between the stress components and their contributions to the invariant. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately applying the yield criterion in material science.
balasekar1005
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I see different versions of the second invariant of the cauchy stress tensor.
Hello all,

I am trying to understand the von Mises yield criterion and stumbled across two equations for the second stress invariant. Although the only difference is a difference in signs (negative and positive), it has been bothering me. Attached are the two versions. Which one is correct and if both are correct, why is there a change in sign?

Thank you,
Bala
 

Attachments

  • wiki.PNG
    wiki.PNG
    297 bytes · Views: 246
  • othersource.PNG
    othersource.PNG
    311 bytes · Views: 242
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have not done theoretical stuff in a long time, so take what I say with a grain of salt ...

The I invariants are the constants of the characteristic polynomial of the stress tensor used to determine the principal stresses so that you can define them to within a sign depending on how you choose to write the equation. What I cannot remember, is if there is a sign convention. Since you are finding both, my guess is that there is not one.

BTW, make sure that you do not confuse J2 with I2.
 
Here's what I've found in one of the books:
$$II_{\sigma}=\frac{1}{2} \left[ tr(\sigma^{2})-(tr \sigma)^2 \right]=- \sigma_{11} \sigma_{22}+ \sigma_{12} \sigma_{21} - \sigma_{11} \sigma_{33} + \sigma_{13} \sigma_{31} - \sigma_{22} \sigma_{33} + \sigma_{23} \sigma_{32}$$
 
Thread 'Local pressures in turbocharger housing?'
This is question for fluid mechanics. Static pressure in the exhaust manifold(turbo car engine) is usually 1.2 to 2.5 times higher than the boost pressure(intake manifold pressure).Boost pressure is around 1bar guage pressure(2bar absolute). Can the local static pressure somewhere inside a turbine housing ever be lower than atmospheric pressure, is this possible? here some links where CFD is used...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
942
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
612