Inverse Fourier transforms and partial fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Fourier transform of the function 1/(iw+3)³. Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of partial fractions and properties related to cubic terms in the context of Fourier transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fractions and express confusion about how to handle cubic terms in the inverse Fourier transform. There are questions about the applicability of differentiation properties and whether there are relevant properties for powers.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their attempts and expressed similar difficulties, indicating a collaborative exploration of the problem. There is a recognition of the need for clarification on the methods applicable to this type of transform.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions an impending midterm, highlighting the urgency of understanding the topic. There is also a reference to a course specifically focused on Fourier transforms, which may influence the context of the discussion.

Luongo
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
1. find the inverse FT of 1/(iw+3)3



2. well partial fractions gave the same thing back... I'm not sure how to transform this as there's no property that deals with cubics.



3. i tried using the differentiation property but it doesn't work as it increases the power of 3 to 4 and so on... how would i go about computing the inverse Fourier transform of this? is there a property involving powers out there? how would you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with using partial fractions for inverse Fourier transforms but it looks like that would be easy to integrate directly. Do you mean Laplace transform?
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not familiar with using partial fractions for inverse Fourier transforms but it looks like that would be easy to integrate directly. Do you mean Laplace transform?
the course is called "the Fourier transform and its applications" so yeah I'm pretty sure i don't mean laplace transform. can someone help please my midterms tommorow and i have no clue..
 
Hey Luongo, did you ever figure out how to do this problem? I have the exact same question on my problem set and have no idea what to do either, I ended up trying partial fractions just like you and it didn't work so I'm stumped.
 
1/(iw+3) = 3/(w2 +9) - iw/(w2 +9) = (1/√(w2 +9))ei arctan(w/3)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K