Inverse Laplace transform. Bromwitch integral

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Inverse Laplace transform
[tex]\mathcal{L}^{-1}[F(p)]=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int^{c+i\infty}_{c-i\infty}F(s)e^{st}dp=f(t)[/tex]

Question if we integrate along a straight line in complex plane where axis are [tex]Re(p)[/tex], [tex]Im(p)[/tex], why we integrate from [tex]c-i \ínfty[/tex] to [tex]c+\infty[/tex]? So my question is, because [tex]Im(p)[/tex] are also real numbers why we integrate from [tex]c-i\infty[/tex] to [tex]c+i\infty[/tex].
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing that you meant that the integral is with respect to [itex]s[/itex], not [itex]p[/itex]. Anyway, for the traditional Laplace transform,
F(s) = \int^{\infty}_{0} dt e^{-s t} f(t)

[itex]F(s)[/itex] is only analytic for some right half plane (that is [itex]\Re(s)>s_0[/itex]). So for the inverse transform you pick a [itex]c>s_0[/itex] for your path.

Does that help?

jason
 
Yes. Mistake. I understand that. I am not very good in complex analysis. My question is if [tex[Im(s)[/tex] are real numbers why I integrate from [tex]c-i\infty[/tex] to [tex]c+i\infty[/tex]? Why I have this [tex]i[/tex]? Thanks for the answer.