Inverse Square Law + Special Relativity

nassboy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
If one assumes that Newtons inverse square law does not act instantly at a distance, and instead obeys the rules of special relativity does it make similar predictions as general relativity?

Has anybody worked this out? Maybe the result is similar to maxwell's equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The EM potential acting at a retarded time already followed from Maxwell's equations, well before relativity. The effect is well understood and has nothing to do with GR.
 
nassboy said:
If one assumes that Newtons inverse square law does not act instantly at a distance, and instead obeys the rules of special relativity does it make similar predictions as general relativity?

Has anybody worked this out? Maybe the result is similar to maxwell's equations.

Yes, and the results are similar to GR, but there are differences. Wald writes in his book on GR that this would have been the more straightforward way to describe gravity. Had Einstein not invented GR, we would very likely have been stuck with a flawed theory for a very long time (because if observations show a small discepancy, you can always model that by introducing extra terms).

Kaku has claimed that GR would only have been formulated in the 1970s, had Einstein not discovered it.
 
nassboy said:
f one assumes that Newtons inverse square law does not act instantly at a distance, and instead obeys the rules of special relativity does it make similar predictions as general relativity?
Similar but not the same. It doesn't predict spatial curvature and gravitational time dilation. Discussed here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=324457&p=2270590
 
Reversing the question then...can maxwell's equations be formulated more like GR?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top