Investigating InstinctiveNavigation: Is It Legit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElliotSmith
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the legitimacy of the website "instinctivenavigation.com," which is purportedly linked to a model's portfolio that a professional photographer is trying to access. Participants explore the website's current status, its potential future availability, and the implications of the link being provided by a rival photographer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses doubt about the legitimacy of the website, noting it has displayed an "over capacity" message for weeks.
  • Another participant suggests that the website may simply be under construction and questions the motivations of the person who provided the link.
  • Some participants speculate that the model may have switched to a different URL, implying that the provided link could be outdated or intentionally misleading.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of direct communication with the model or her agent, suggesting that the photographer should explore other networking options.
  • There is a suggestion that the website has been around since 2012, which raises questions about its current status and future availability.
  • Multiple participants emphasize the uncertainty surrounding whether the website will return online or remain inactive indefinitely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty regarding the website's legitimacy and future status. There is no consensus on whether the link was provided with malicious intent or if it is simply outdated.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity of the website's status, the potential for outdated information, and the implications of relying on a rival for critical professional connections.

ElliotSmith
Messages
167
Reaction score
104
I'm looking for certain photographs, and I was linked to this mysterious website and told that I would find what I'm looking for there.

But I'm not sure if I was deliberately given a phony link, this website is of questionable legitimacy. Could someone look into this website and verify it's legitimacy or tell me if it's just a dead end that was given to confuse and misdirect me?

It has said "sorry, we're over capacity" for several weeks now, which leads me to believe that "instinctivenavigation" is not a real website.

This appears to be some sort under construction landing page, but I can't be entirely sure.

Will this website be back online at the time in the future?

http://instinctivenavigation.com

Does the above link seem legit to you?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
The URL under the link you provided links to what looks like a specific user port folio. Nonetheless, the instinctivenavigation.com link does the same thing as you describe.

Googling 'instinctive navigation' shows a single hit.

whois.com turns up a few deets:
https://who.is/whois/instinctivenavigation.com

They have some more in-depth info, here:
https://who.godaddy.com/whoisstd.aspx?domain=instinctivenavigation.com&prog_id=GoDaddy&k=ygvBukgDBhvMQvVjbkbFpehb77RIh2dx9EC8jG6IG+ZjHw4%2f%2fj5wTaRHXs8iq55dzHHjar4HEOc%3d

No reason to suspect weirdness, probably someone registered the name and haven't built it yet.

I think the key question here is: who pointed you at this URL, and why?
 
DaveC426913 said:
The URL under the link you provided links to what looks like a specific user port folio. Nonetheless, the instinctivenavigation.com link does the same thing as you describe.

Googling 'instinctive navigation' shows a single hit.

whois.com turns up a few deets:
https://who.is/whois/instinctivenavigation.com

They have some more in-depth info, here:
https://who.godaddy.com/whoisstd.aspx?domain=instinctivenavigation.com&prog_id=GoDaddy&k=ygvBukgDBhvMQvVjbkbFpehb77RIh2dx9EC8jG6IG+ZjHw4%2f%2fj5wTaRHXs8iq55dzHHjar4HEOc%3d

No reason to suspect weirdness, probably someone registered the name and haven't built it yet.

I think the key question here is: who pointed you at this URL, and why?

I work as a professional photographer in the fashion/modeling industry and I'm looking for a specific model's portfolio because I am interested in working with her.

Someone closely associated with that model linked me to her portfolio and told me that's where she used to keep it, but the website provided to me in the link doesn't seem to work, at least not for now.

Do you think it will be back online sometime in the future? Or will it just say "we're over capacity" indefinitely?
 
Last edited:
Doesn't someone "closely associated" with her know the name of her agent?
 
ElliotSmith said:
I work as a professional photographer in the fashion/modeling industry and I'm looking for a specific model's portfolio because I am interested in working with her.

Someone closely associated with that model linked me to her portfolio and told me that's where she used to keep it, but the website provided to me in the link doesn't seem to work, at least not for now.

Do you think it will be back online sometime in the future? Or will it just say "we're over capacity" indefinitely?

How would we know if the owner of that site plans on putting it back online sometime in the future? The message on the page indicates that it will be back, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Our guess is as good as yours.

And why would you not contact whomever is "closely associated with that model" to find out more information. The site that was given to you is obviously not functional at this time.
 
Last edited:
ElliotSmith said:
I work as a professional photographer in the fashion/modeling industry and I'm looking for a specific model's portfolio because I am interested in working with her.

Someone closely associated with that model linked me to her portfolio and told me that's where she used to keep it, but the website provided to me in the link doesn't seem to work, at least not for now.
Oh. It's not the website you're interested in, it's that model.

ElliotSmith said:
Do you think it will be back online sometime in the future? Or will it just say "we're over capacity" indefinitely?
No way to know.

I wouldn't hold my breath. The ways this would be a permanent state far outnumber the ways this would change in the near future.
 
The person who gave me that link is a rival photographer of mine and we have a very bad and shaky relationship.

I wonder if I was intentionally given bum info.
 
ElliotSmith said:
The person who gave me that link is a rival photographer of mine and we have a very bad and shaky relationship.

I wonder if I was intentionally given bum info.

You may have been given bum info in that the model may now be using some OTHER URL and your rival knows that but gave you the old one on purpose.
 
phinds said:
You may have been given bum info in that the model may now be using some OTHER URL and your rival knows that but gave you the old one on purpose.

I am just hoping that "instinctivenavigation" will start working again.

Checking the IP address of that website says that it's been around since 2012.
 
  • #10
Surely, for a professional photographer such as yourself, there are more direct routes to connecting with a model, or model's agent, to inquire about working with them.

If this dead site is your only link to her, perhaps it's time to refresh your networking contacts so you can get introduced to her properly.Actually, re-reading your OP, you say you are "looking for certain photographs". Do you want to work with this model, or are you merely looking to get hold of some existing pictures of her that are of some special interest to you? As I said, surely there are more industry-standard ways to contact people professionally.

(I have a friend who told me she was a Victoria's Secret model many years ago. I'm intrigued to see her in such a different light, but have not tracked her port folio down. Then again, if she wanted me to see those old pics, she would have showed them to me herself.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K