Investigating Limit of Piecewise Function

nycmathguy
Homework Statement
Graphs & Functions
Relevant Equations
Piecewise Functions
Use the graph to investigate

(a) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the left side.

(b) lim of f(x) as x→2 from the right side.

(c) lim of f(x) as x→2.

Question 20

For part (a), as I travel along on the x-axis coming from the left, the graph reaches a height of 4. The limit is 4. It does not matter if there is a hole at (2, 4), right?

For part (b), as I travel along on the x-axis coming from the right, the graph reaches a height of 2. The limit is 2. It does not matter if there is a hole at (2, 2), right?

For part (c), LHL DOES NOT EQUAL RHL.

I conclude the limit does not exist.

You say?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210613-160046_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20210613-160046_Drive.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 158
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark44 said:
Yes to all.

I got another question right. It's a miracle. I need to understand this limit idea better. I know that limits in calculus 3 are more involved.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top