Ion Drive Question - Ionization process

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the operational requirements and limitations of ion engines, particularly regarding their functionality in non-vacuum environments. It is established that ion engines, such as those tested by NASA and ESA, require a vacuum chamber for optimal ionization, as atmospheric pressure significantly hinders their performance. The conversation also highlights that ion engines are ineffective underwater due to high gas density, which complicates ion production. The DS4G thruster technology is mentioned as a promising advancement in ion propulsion, potentially addressing some of these limitations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ion engine design and operation
  • Knowledge of vacuum chamber requirements for ionization
  • Familiarity with ion optics and grid erosion issues
  • Awareness of advancements in ion propulsion technology, such as DS4G
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the DS4G thruster technology for improved ion propulsion
  • Explore the DARPA WALRUS program and its implications for atmospheric ion propulsion
  • Investigate the principles of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) engines as alternatives to ion engines
  • Study the effects of atmospheric pressure on ionization efficiency in ion engines
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, propulsion researchers, and enthusiasts interested in ion engine technology and its applications in various environments.

Halzman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm fairly familiar with the design and operation of an ion engine, although I do have a two questions in regard to its operation.

1) Normally, an ion engine would be used in space (which is naturally a vacuum) and would output its given thrust. Prior to space flight, is there a need to maintain the vacuum within the chamber where the ionization occurs?

2) When looking at the ion optics, we see that there is 2 perferated sheets, with holes .1 mm range (if i remember correctly) on each sheet. I'm assuming that this would be enough to cause a 'leak' in the chamber, if it was a vacuum to begin with. Does the chamber need to be a vacuum in order for the ionization to occur? If yes, what is the highest pressure density that the chamber can be in order for ionization to occur? I guess more specifically my question is, can an ion engine function in a non vacuum environment? (obviously there would be a problem with weight to thrust, but I'm not concerened with that)

I'm aware that NASA (it could of been the ESA) uses a vacuum chamber to test the ion engine. I'm just curious if it would function in a normal atmospheric pressure environment, and if not, could you balance it out by maintaining a certain vacuum within the chamber.

Just thought of a 3rd question: Would an ion drive work under water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The greater the density of gas in the ion engine, the higher the current/energy necessary to produce ions, and just ions. The density needs to be reduced to optimize the number of ions as opposed to neutral atoms. Otherwise, one simply ends up with a discharge in a gas.

The aspect is that the thrust is so low that it simply would not work in an atmosphere.

An ion engine like the gas engine described would not work underwater.

One might wish to use an MHD engine instead.
 
Astronuc said:
The greater the density of gas in the ion engine, the higher the current/energy necessary to produce ions, and just ions. The density needs to be reduced to optimize the number of ions as opposed to neutral atoms. Otherwise, one simply ends up with a discharge in a gas.

The aspect is that the thrust is so low that it simply would not work in an atmosphere.

An ion engine like the gas engine described would not work underwater.

One might wish to use an MHD engine instead.

Pretty much expected it not to work in a regular atmosphere/underwater. Just had to ask. However, couldn't the thrust be improved by pumping more power? I know currently were not capable of supply effecient amounts of power to an ion drive (one that's space bound atleast) but is that 1 of the most limiting factors when it comes to thrust?
 
Halzman said:
Pretty much expected it not to work in a regular atmosphere/underwater. Just had to ask. However, couldn't the thrust be improved by pumping more power? I know currently were not capable of supply effecient amounts of power to an ion drive (one that's space bound atleast) but is that 1 of the most limiting factors when it comes to thrust?
The accelerating potential is the limiting aspect.


You may wish to investigate the DS4G thruster technology

http://prl.anu.edu.au/SP3/research/SAFEandDS4G

http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/propulsion/safe_thruster.htm

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMOSTG23IE_Expanding_0.html

http://www.abc.net.au/ra/innovations/stories/s1579297.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
The accelerating potential is the limiting aspect.

You may wish to investigate the DS4G thruster technology

http://prl.anu.edu.au/SP3/research/SAFEandDS4G

http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/propulsion/safe_thruster.htm

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMOSTG23IE_Expanding_0.html

http://www.abc.net.au/ra/innovations/stories/s1579297.htm

Thanks, I actually became aware of the new type of ion drive a few days ago. Looks very promising and interesting. I've been interested in building and testing my own ion drive. I have a solid design for the drive itself, as well as all the components. Whether the chamber needs to be a vacuum was the only main question I had. I was aware of the grid errosion problem, so to here about ESA's DS4G was almost a 'breakthrough' on my end. I had always intended to use xenon, as NASA did on DSP.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thinking outside the box

keep in mind the new ion engine advances, and the DARPA WALRUS program which may use atmospheric ion propulsion. I want to spin a 56' rotor to a tip speed of 210 MPH using 5 small ion thrusters. Is this possible?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K