Iraqi unrest, Syrian unrest, and ISIS/ISIL/Daesh

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the deteriorating security situation in Iraq, particularly the rise of ISIS and the potential collapse of the Iraqi government under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The U.S. administration's refusal to provide military aid is attributed to fears of supporting al-Maliki and inadvertently backing Iran. Participants express concern that the Sunni insurgents' control over Baghdad could lead to renewed conflict between Iran and Iraq. The discussion highlights the ineffectiveness of the Iraqi army, which failed to confront ISIS despite being significantly outnumbered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, particularly Iraq and Iran.
  • Familiarity with the history and dynamics of Sunni and Shiite sectarian conflicts.
  • Knowledge of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, especially during the Obama administration.
  • Awareness of the implications of military intervention and withdrawal in conflict zones.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of the Iraq War and its aftermath, focusing on the rise of ISIS.
  • Examine the role of U.S. foreign policy in shaping the current situation in Iraq.
  • Study the implications of sectarian divisions in Middle Eastern politics.
  • Investigate strategies for countering insurgent movements in politically unstable regions.
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, military strategists, historians, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of Middle Eastern conflicts and U.S. foreign policy implications.

  • #1,051
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm curious why the leaked John Kerry comments about letting ISIS grow as a strategy to oust Assad isn't a bigger deal. What am I missing?
Certainly some sites are making it a big deal.

The Daily Wire reports on the statement, with a link to the audio.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/12211/listen-kerry-admits-obama-watched-isis-get-frank-camp

What is not reported is the period of time in reference, although it appears the period is before the Russians became directly engaged through aircraft bombardment. From the Daily Wire report:
It cannot be extrapolated from Kerry saying: "and we know that this was growing--we were watching. We saw that Daesh was growing in strength, and we thought Assad was threatened," that the Obama administration was purposefully allowing ISIS to grow. Kerry said that the administration saw that ISIS was growing, was watching that growth, and hoped that such growth would lead to negotiations with Assad.
The US was supporting the Free Syrian Army and allies, but there was a problem identifying who among the allies were not sympathetic or allied with folks like al-Nusra Front or al-Qaeda.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-24403003

Is it possible that the growth and influence of Daesh was under-estimated, or that the link between Daesh in Syria and Iraq was not well understood? Possibly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,052
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm curious why the leaked John Kerry comments about letting ISIS grow as a strategy to oust Assad isn't a bigger deal. What am I missing?

It's actually an old story that the NY Times featured months ago. I would say it this way: They saw ISIS grow in Syria in hopes on threatening Assad and pushing him to negotiate, but he brought in Russia instead.

Syria has been a one-party state about the last 40+ years, father then son of the absolute dictator party.:frown: John Kerry met with people lobbying for regime change, he was talking trash about getting rid of Assad but it was too late after Russia was all into help Assad.
 
  • #1,053
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm curious why the leaked John Kerry comments about letting ISIS grow as a strategy to oust Assad isn't a bigger deal. What am I missing?

It doesn't fit The Narrative. The Narrative is that it is a good vs. evil battle, and the US (or at least the present Administration) is on the side of goodness and light. The truth is that it's a battle between about six different kinds of evil. Exactly what the US aims are is difficult to discern, in part because there was no Congressional authorization. Debate on that would have clarified what the goals were.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy, Bystander, Astronuc and 1 other person
  • #1,054
nsaspook said:
It's actually an old story that the NY Times featured months ago. I would say it this way: They saw ISIS grow in Syria in hopes on threatening Assad and pushing him to negotiate, but he brought in Russia instead.
All I can find is this story which I remember reading, but it does not include the part where Kerry tells they let ISIS grow
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/john-kerry-syria-audio.html

That part is only being reported by what appears to be "alt right" publications. Not one mainstream source I can find is reporting on it. Made me suspicious, but I've listened to the audio and it is there.
 
  • #1,055
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm curious why the leaked John Kerry comments about letting ISIS grow as a strategy to oust Assad isn't a bigger deal. What am I missing?
That Kerry's statement does not mean the US could have positively changed the outcome via different action.

From the Daily Wire, Frank Camp, link Astronuc referenced:

...
Nowhere does Kerry say that the United States had the ability to stop the development of the Islamic State in Syria as it was at the time. Nowhere does he say that the United States helped or allowed them to grow--only that such growth was observed.

This isn't to say that the administration's action (or inaction, as it were) was right. This isn't to say that they couldn't have hindered ISIS or gone about their strategy a different way. We simply don't know
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
  • #1,056
removed , til i think on it some more.

old jim
 

Attachments

  • janesArms2Sytia.jpg
    janesArms2Sytia.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 564
Last edited:
  • #1,057
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K