A Iron ionisation energy value query

Claude_Pellerin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at fe ionisation. Wherever I look I get similar values. Probably because everybody just keeps reusing published values...
I think the value for the 24 th level is incorrect but I'm not sure how to validate this.
The published value is 195200 but I think it should be more like 197400.
Any pointer to a definitive source would be appreciated.
 
Why do you think it should be 197400? And where does the other value come from?
 
Can you kindly provide us with references?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top