Is 1/4π built into G, the gravitational constant?

In summary, we went over Coulomb's law today, which can be stated as (1/ε0)(1/(4πr2))(|q1q2|). This equation is very similar to Newton's law of gravitation, but it contains 1/4pir^2, which makes sense because the electric force is being diluted over the surface of a sphere. The 1/(4πr2) term is built into G in Newton's law, but not in the force equation. In contrast, in Gauss' law of electrostatics, there is no need to include the 4π term. This difference is due to historical conventions and does not have a deeper meaning. However, there are other systems
  • #1
EternusVia
93
10
We went over Coulomb's law today, which can be stated as

(1/ε0)(1/(4πr2))(|q1q2|)

This equation is very similar to Newton's law of gravitation, but it contains 1/4pir^2. This makes sense, because the electric force is being diluted over the surface of a sphere.

Is 1/(4πr2) built into G as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why would it be? Is gravity diluted over the surface of a sphere?
 
  • #3
EternusVia said:
We went over Coulomb's law today, which can be stated as

(1/ε0)(1/(4πr2))(|q1q2|)

This equation is very similar to Newton's law of gravitation, but it contains 1/4pir^2. This makes sense, because the electric force is being diluted over the surface of a sphere. Is 1/(4πr2) built into G as well?

Yes. You have a certain amount of "stuff", whatever it is, that is being spread out over a larger surface area.

The inverse square law is ubiquitous. The reason for it is just a lot more clear in some equations.
 
  • #4
Yes, when comparing Newton's Universal Law of Gravity to Coulomb's law, the [itex]4 \pi [/itex] is built into the G in Newton's law. There's no need to include an additional [itex]4 \pi [/itex] when talking about Newton's equation.

On the other hand, as a consequence, You do need to include the [itex] 4 \pi [/itex] when working with Gauss' Law of Gravitation. This is contrasted with Gauss' law of electrostatics, where there is no need to include the [itex] 4 \pi [/itex].

In summary:
Gravitation: The [itex] 4 \pi [/itex] is [needed] in Gauss' law, but not in the force equation.
Electrostatics: The [itex] 4 \pi [/itex] is [needed within] part of the force equation, but not in the Gauss law.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
To add another perspective:

It depends on where do you start deriving the equation.

If you adding a constant to inverse square law of gravitational force, then there is no 4pi;
If you start by treating gravity as charges distributed in a sphere and apply Gauss's law, there is a 4pi.
 
  • #6
lowerlowerhk said:
To add another perspective:

It depends on where do you start deriving the equation.

If you adding a constant to inverse square law of gravitational force, then there is no 4pi;
If you start by treating gravity as charges distributed in a sphere and apply Gauss's law, there is a 4pi.
Right, I agree it makes sense depending on how you approach it. My point though, is that for whatever reason (and there may be good reasons depending on how one approaches it) equations are different in this respect for gravity and electromagnetism. The placement of the [itex] 4 \pi [/itex] is essentially swapped between conventional versions of gravity equations and conventional electrostatic equations.

Gravity:
Newton's Universal Gravitation:
[tex] \vec F = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \hat {a_r} [/tex]
Gauss' law for gravity:
[tex] \oint \vec g \cdot \vec {dA} = -4 \pi Gm_{enc} [/tex]

Electrostatics:
Coulomb's Law:
[tex] \vec F = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0}\frac{q_1 q_2}{r_2} \hat {a_r} [/tex]
Gauss' Law
[tex] \oint \vec E \cdot \vec {dA} = \frac{q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0} [/tex]
 
  • #7
Good point, didn't notice that before.

There is a historical reason of this swapping. For gravity, Newton's Law of Gravitation is well known before formulating gravitational Gauss's law, so the G is left as it is by convention.
For the Electrostatics, the reason to add a 4pi to Coulomb's law is to maintain numerical consistency with older unit of measurement.
 
  • #8
The placement of the 4pi is just an arbitrary historical unit convention. There is no deeper meaning behind it.
There are two commonly used sets of metric units (and several less commonly used ones). In SI, the 4pi appears in Coulombs law. In Gaussian cgs units, 4pi doesn't appear there, but instead it shows up in the differential form of Coulomb's law.
 
  • #9
Well this is out of context but it would be better if gravitational law is written in same form as Coulomb's law because the later is easier to understand .these fundamental mental forces of nature act very differently but can be described by almost same equations who doesn't like uniformity of equations?
 
  • #10
Quantumofthough said:
Well this is out of context but it would be better if gravitational law is written in same form as Coulomb's law because the later is easier to understand .these fundamental mental forces of nature act very differently but can be described by almost same equations who doesn't like uniformity of equations?
There are numerous "conventions" in science that are present for historical reasons and would be better done some other way but they are what they are and the best one can do is accept it and move on since they are not going to change.
 
  • Like
Likes Quantumofthough
  • #11
phinds said:
There are numerous "conventions" in science that are present for historical reasons and would be better done some other way but they are what they are and the best one can do is accept it and move on since they are not going to change.
phinds said:
There are numerous "conventions" in science that are present for historical reasons and would be better done some other way but they are what they are and the best one can do is accept it and move on since they are not going to change.
Yeah I guess we should respect the tradition :(
 
  • #12
Quantumofthough said:
Yeah I guess we should respect the tradition :(
Well, I wouldn't call it respect, I'd just call it acceptance. The people who came up with the conventions deserve respect but their conventions do not, always. Had they known more they likely would have come up with better conventions but they advanced science and that's more important than that they left us with inconvenient conventions.
 

1. What is the significance of 1/4π in the gravitational constant?

The value 1/4π is not explicitly built into the gravitational constant, but it is a result of the mathematical derivation of the constant. It arises from the use of spherical coordinates in the calculation of the gravitational force between two objects.

2. How does 1/4π affect the value of the gravitational constant?

The value of 1/4π has no direct effect on the numerical value of the gravitational constant. It is simply a mathematical factor that is necessary for the calculation of the force of gravity between two objects.

3. Why is 1/4π used instead of a whole number in the gravitational constant?

The use of 1/4π in the gravitational constant is a convention that makes the equations for gravity more concise and elegant. It also allows for easier comparison and conversion between different units of measurement.

4. Is 1/4π unique to the gravitational constant or is it used in other physical constants?

The value 1/4π is not unique to the gravitational constant and can be found in other physical constants such as the Coulomb constant in electrostatics and the permeability of free space in electromagnetism. It is a mathematical constant that is commonly used in equations involving spherical symmetry.

5. Can the value of 1/4π in the gravitational constant be changed?

No, the value of 1/4π in the gravitational constant is a mathematical constant that cannot be changed. Altering this value would result in a completely different mathematical model for the force of gravity, which would not accurately describe the observed behavior of objects in the universe.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
91
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
747
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top