Is 2009 Really the Year of Astronomy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjsd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Year
AI Thread Summary
2009 is designated as the International Year of Astronomy to commemorate the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of "Astronomia nova." This year presents an opportunity to engage students in astrophysics and discuss foundational concepts like the Hubble redshift-distance relation. The significance of 2009 is not just a public relations initiative; it aims to highlight historical advancements in astronomy. Observational astronomers have historically approached findings with caution, as seen in Hubble's reluctance to fully endorse the Big Bang theory despite its popularity. Overall, the year encourages educational outreach and deeper exploration of astronomical science.
mjsd
Homework Helper
Messages
725
Reaction score
3
I heard that this year is the Year of Astronomy. Being a "physicist" at the university, a local science teacher invited me to help out with writing some talks/presentations for the students at their high school on the topics of astrophysics...

So, why 2009? What is so special? What is going to happen? Just a public relation thing or the scientific community have something special install? What are the views of the researchers in the Astronomy sector on this?

comments welcomed :smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It might be a good opportunity to touch on some basics, like the Hubble redshift-distance relation, and put that in some historical perspective. As a very prominent observational astronomer wrote me in 1988 after attending the "Cosmology in Retrospect" symposium (and having reviewed Hubble's papers) "Hubble always said 'if the redshift means velocity', and even in a paper published in 1953 after his death, he said 'c x z = velocity is not formally correct.' " The proponents of the Big Bang (Gamow et al) seized on Hubble's work to "prove" expansion, though Hubble was reluctant to endorse that. He was a cautious and conservative observer.
 
mjsd said:
So, why 2009? What is so special?

Formally, 2009 being chosen as the international year of astronomy is because it commemorates both the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of Astronomia nova.
 
thanks for the comments.



Nabeshin said:
Formally, 2009 being chosen as the international year of astronomy is because it commemorates both the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first telescopic observations and Kepler's publication of Astronomia nova.

oh, is that why eh? ok... :smile:

either way, should be a good opportunity for me to learn more about astro/cosmology...
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top