Is a Chemistry Major Eligible for a Graduate Program in Nuclear Engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the eligibility of a chemistry major for graduate programs in nuclear engineering, considering the participant's current academic path and potential changes to their major. It explores the qualifications needed for admission, the relevance of various undergraduate courses, and the implications of switching majors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, a second-year chemistry major, inquires about the feasibility of applying to nuclear engineering graduate programs without changing majors, given their university only offers a minor in nuclear engineering.
  • Some participants suggest that nuclear engineering graduate programs may accept candidates from diverse backgrounds, including physics and mechanical engineering, but typically require some remedial coursework.
  • There are mentions of essential subjects that may be necessary for a strong foundation in nuclear engineering, such as neutron diffusion theory, radiation physics, and introductory courses in electrical, mechanical, and civil engineering.
  • One participant highlights the importance of water chemistry and corrosion in nuclear engineering, noting the demand for expertise in these areas, particularly in advanced systems like the Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR).
  • Another participant shares their mixed experiences with academic advisors and discusses the possibility of majoring in engineering physics, which could provide a relevant background for graduate studies in nuclear engineering.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential impact of switching to an engineering physics major on future graduate school applications compared to a mechanical engineering degree.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best path forward for the original poster, with some supporting the idea of switching majors while others emphasize the value of the current chemistry background. There is no consensus on the optimal major or the specific qualifications needed for graduate admission.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for upper-level remedial courses for those without a nuclear engineering background, but specific requirements may vary by program. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the best academic path and the implications of different majors on graduate school prospects.

Flat
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Hello all, currently I am a second year chemistry major (minoring in nuclear engineering). I am wondering if I would be qualified to be accepted to a graduate school in nuclear engineering without changing my major? My University does not off nuclear engineering as a major unfortunately (only minor and graduate). I'm also contemplating switching to chemical engineering (won't set me back much, and I would have some engineering classes under my belt before hand). Thoughts or comments?


This was suppose to be in the academic section. If I can figure out how to delete this thread I will, and repost in academic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no nuclear engineer, but from what I've seen, it seems that nuclear engineering grad programs tend to be accepting to those without nuclear engineering as an undergrad degree. I think that these people tend to come from physics and mechanical engineering though. Since your school does have the nuclear grad program, I'd say just take as many courses with them as possible (even more than minimum for the minor if you can). This way, you'll have a good foundation for later studies.
 
It is possible for someone with a BS in physics or engineering to enter a graduate program in nuclear engineering. Usually some upper level remedial courses may be necessary.

Does the undergraduate program at the current university have any course in transport or diffusion theory, preferably neutron diffusion? I was in a physics program at one university, and they offered a nuclear reactor (neutron diffusion) theory course, but through the chemical engineering department.

In addition to nuclear reactor theory and radiation physics, one is expected to have some background in introductory EE, Mech Eng (thermodynamics, fluid mechanics), and CivEng/Structural Eng (mechanics of materials).
 
cmos said:
I'm no nuclear engineer, but from what I've seen, it seems that nuclear engineering grad programs tend to be accepting to those without nuclear engineering as an undergrad degree. I think that these people tend to come from physics and mechanical engineering though. Since your school does have the nuclear grad program, I'd say just take as many courses with them as possible (even more than minimum for the minor if you can). This way, you'll have a good foundation for later studies.

Astronuc said:
It is possible for someone with a BS in physics or engineering to enter a graduate program in nuclear engineering. Usually some upper level remedial courses may be necessary.

Does the undergraduate program at the current university have any course in transport or diffusion theory, preferably neutron diffusion? I was in a physics program at one university, and they offered a nuclear reactor (neutron diffusion) theory course, but through the chemical engineering department.

In addition to nuclear reactor theory and radiation physics, one is expected to have some background in introductory EE, Mech Eng (thermodynamics, fluid mechanics), and CivEng/Structural Eng (mechanics of materials).

Thanks for the responses.
At my school the minor program is consisted of the graduate nuclear engineering courses. Astronuc, I'll look more closely into the descriptions and make sure I have atleast the fundamentals of what you have suggested. The more I think about it, the better switching to chemical engineering sounds. I have made an appointment with a nuclear engineering advisor, hopefuly all goes well (I have had a lot of positive and a lot of negative experiences with academic advisors, hah).
 
Flat said:
Thanks for the responses.
At my school the minor program is consisted of the graduate nuclear engineering courses. Astronuc, I'll look more closely into the descriptions and make sure I have atleast the fundamentals of what you have suggested. The more I think about it, the better switching to chemical engineering sounds. I have made an appointment with a nuclear engineering advisor, hopefuly all goes well (I have had a lot of positive and a lot of negative experiences with academic advisors, hah).
My experience with academic advisers has been mixed.

One of the hot areas in nuclear engineering is water chemistry and corrosion (in a high temperature/pressure environment). Vendors (the suppliers of technology), utilities and service companies are desparate for anyone with experience in materials and corrosion. It's not a trivial problem since there are a huge number of cation species, radiolytic reactions, and electro-chemical reactions. There are enormous challenges associated with advanced systems, particularly the Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR) concepts. At the moment there is essentially no experience on corrosion of various advanced materials at the proposed temperatures in a radiation field (neutrons and gammas).
 
Astronuc said:
My experience with academic advisers has been mixed.

UPDATE: Spoke with an advisor and she recommended to major in engineering physics (Specializing in nuclear engineering). The more that I think about it, the better it sounds (taking physics, math and mechanical and nuclear engineering courses) for graduate school.
Unfortunately I do not know anyone who is in or graduated with and engineering physics degree.
Right now I am just concerned over the chances of being accepted into a nuclear engineering graduate program as compared with a mechanical engineering degree. The engineering physics program looks interesting (and I am glad she brought it up because I had no idea it existed) but I do not want to go into it if it will hurt me later on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K