Is a gaussian distribution 'like a sine wave'

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between Gaussian distributions and sine waves, emphasizing that they are fundamentally different mathematical functions. Gaussian distributions, characterized by a single peak and tails that approach zero, do not exhibit the periodic oscillation of sine waves, which oscillate between -1 and +1. While both functions are important in various scientific contexts, such as linear systems and Fourier transforms, they serve different purposes and cannot be equated. The argument presented by the office mate is incorrect, as a sine wave cannot function as a valid probability distribution function (pdf).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian distributions and their properties
  • Familiarity with sine waves and their mathematical characteristics
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Basic concepts of probability distribution functions (pdfs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Gaussian distributions in detail
  • Learn about the mathematical characteristics of sine waves
  • Explore the implications of Fourier transforms in signal processing
  • Investigate the role of eigenfunctions in linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, data scientists, and anyone interested in the differences between probability distributions and periodic functions.

leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
So I was having a conversation with the guy I share an office with and I brought up the gaussian distribution to show the probability distribution of energies of electrons generated by a filament. He mentioned that it 'looks like a sine wave', and I said 'sorta, but it's not a sine wave'. He said that everything in nature behaves like a sine wave and then I replied that exponentials with imaginary arguments are sine waves, but a gaussian distribution isn't really like a sine wave.

So, is there any truth to my office mate's argument, or is it irrelevant or incorrect to even bring it up?

I suppose all functions can be described by an infinite sum of sines and cosines of a spectrum of frequencies and phases angles using Fourier transforms even if the function isn't periodic, but I can't conclude that this means all functions behave like sines and cosines.

Maybe I am just not understanding his argument. It was probably a waste of time to et into an argument about in the first place, but I thought I'd get your opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a very crude idea:
A gaussian curve should have an identifiable amplitude and identifiable period. Would a sine wave duplicate or nearly enough duplicate the points on the gaussian curve? ...
... See, I told you my idea is very very crude.
 
The Gaussian curve has one max, is always >0 and tails off to 0 as x-> -oo or oo. The sine curve oscillates between -1 and +1 in a completely repetitive way. In no way do they look alike.
 
mathman said:
The Gaussian curve has one max, is always >0 and tails off to 0 as x-> -oo or oo. The sine curve oscillates between -1 and +1 in a completely repetitive way. In no way do they look alike.

Yes, this is the obvious answer and is all I wanted to hear. I was just looking for a second opinion or backup opinion, since this pointless argument dragged on for a while and I wasn't really able to convince him that a Gaussian distribution wasn't really 'like' a sine wave.

Thanks for the support. :)
 
Sure it is. It's kind of wavy.
 
The two functions are nothing at all alike, as mathman says. Furthermore, a probability distribution function must have a finite integral, so a sine wave is not even a valid pdf.

In one sense, though, both sine waves and Gaussians are similarly 'special.' Sine waves are eigenfunctions of the differential equations that govern linear systems, which means that if you put a sine wave into a linear system, you get another sine wave out. Gaussians are the eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform, which means that if you take the Fourier transform of a Gaussian, you get back another Gaussian.

Since linear systems and Fourier transforms exist everywhere in nature (acoustics, optics, electronics, etc.), they are both extremely important.

- Warren
 
leright said:
So I was having a conversation with the guy I share an office with and I brought up the gaussian distribution to show the probability distribution of energies of electrons generated by a filament.

Since the above statement indicates that you are at least somewhat familiar with a Gaussian distribution I find it very puzzling that you failed to notice that it was different to a sine wave. It’s a bit like asking if a gasoline motor and a rodeo clown are sort of the same thing. It would certainly seem a strange question, but even more so if the person asking it was apparently already at least somewhat familiar with both of those items.
 
uart said:
Since the above statement indicates that you are at least somewhat familiar with a Gaussian distribution I find it very puzzling that you failed to notice that it was different to a sine wave. It’s a bit like asking if a gasoline motor and a rodeo clown are sort of the same thing. It would certainly seem a strange question, but even more so if the person asking it was apparently already at least somewhat familiar with both of those items.

no uart, it was clear as day that they were different to me...but I just wanted a second opinion to demonstrate to this person I am arguing with that they are in fact different, since I can't seem to get it through his head no matter what I say.
 
Can this person draw the two functions on paper?

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K