Are Gundams Classified as Robots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smthn2pndr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Robot
AI Thread Summary
The term "robot" has evolved from its original definition of an autonomous mechanical device to encompass a broader range of automated and remotely controlled machines. The debate centers on whether Gundams, large bipedal machines from the franchise, can be classified as robots. One viewpoint argues that since Gundams are piloted, they do not fit the traditional definition of a robot, which is often seen as requiring autonomy. However, others contend that Gundams can be considered robots in a more general sense, as they perform robot-like actions and are part of the cultural lexicon describing giant robot battles. The distinction between robots and mechas is also highlighted, with mechas being defined as large mechanical humanoid machines controlled by pilots. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in definitions when discussing robotics and related terminology.
smthn2pndr
I'm debating with a friend of mine whether or not the term "robot" can be used to describe the large bipedal machines known as Gundams from the franchise of the same name. He's insisting that a robot cannot be something piloted, that a robot is purely something automated or remotely controlled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Words have many definitions. The only way to avoid is to specify which definition you are using.

Robot used to have a very narrow definition of an autonomous mechanical device, but the term has changed in its application.

Your friend needs to accept this. If he wants to talk about autonomous robots, he should specify autonomous robots.
 
smthn2pndr said:
I'm debating with a friend of mine whether or not the term "robot" can be used to describe the large bipedal machines known as Gundams from the franchise of the same name. He's insisting that a robot cannot be something piloted, that a robot is purely something automated or remotely controlled.

http://www.usfirst.org/
 
Technically it is a suit, more like a Mech. I suppose the Mech can perform robot like actions.
 
I agree, it can perform actions of a robot, etc..., such as telling you points on the suit where it is damaged. But it is as much of a robot as a car today is a robot, or your body a robot (we have pain that indicates to us where points of injury are located).
 
"DRAGON RUNNER is a backpackable multi-terrain robot capable of detecting a variety of devices without putting the operator in harm's way" - from the British Ministry of Defence website. It's a robot but it's operated. Yeah I do wonder what makes these things robots. Really it should have a narrow definition, an autonomous machine made through non biological means maybe?
 
A gundam is a robot in the sense that you can say "Mobile Suit Gundam has awesome giant robot battles in it" and no one would try to correct you unless they were *trying* to be annoying.

But it's not really a robot, ofc, it's a mecha. A mecha is a big mechanical humanoid thing that is controlled by a pilot. Or well, it doesn't have to be purely mechanical because, for instance, Evangelion has mecha in it but those are biological/cybernetic or whatever.
 
Back
Top