Is a measurement a correlation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of measurement and its relationship to correlation, specifically questioning whether the outcome of a measurement is correlated with the value being measured. The scope includes conceptual clarification and definitions related to measurement and correlation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the outcome of a measurement and the measured value are the same, seeking to clarify the distinction between these terms.
  • One participant suggests using the phrase "the value (of the thing) being measured" instead of "measured value" to enhance clarity.
  • Another participant challenges the difference between "measured value" and "the value being measured," indicating a lack of consensus on these definitions.
  • A later reply suggests that a more precise question should be posed in a new thread, recommending the citation of the mathematical definition of "correlation."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and distinctions between the outcome of a measurement and the measured value, indicating ongoing disagreement and confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the clarity of terms used, as well as the dependence on precise definitions of measurement and correlation, which remain unresolved.

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
If we make a measurement, does that mean that the outcome of the measurement gets correlated with the measured value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
entropy1 said:
If we make a measurement, does that mean that the outcome of the measurement gets correlated with the measured value?
? What is the difference between "the outcome of the measurement" and "the measured value"? How are they not the same thing?
 
phinds said:
? What is the difference between "the outcome of the measurement" and "the measured value"? How are they not the same thing?
Perhaps I should say "the value (of the thing) being measured" instead of "measured value".
 
entropy1 said:
Perhaps I should say "the value (of the thing) being measured" instead of "measured value".
And how is the "measured value" different from "the value being measured"? This thread is closed.
If you want to start a new thread in which your question is stated more precisely, you may - but I suggest citing the mathematical definition of the word "correlation" when you do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and fresh_42

Similar threads

Undergrad Measuring Second-Order Correlation Function with Start and Stop Signal
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Coherence time for repeated spin measurements
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Undergrad Is the moment of the measurement well defined?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Undergrad Why Does Quantum Entanglement Seem Puzzling Compared to Everyday Correlations?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Correlation setup between past and present
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Undergrad (In)dependence in entanglement experiments
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Graduate Vacuum Energy from Correlation Functions
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad Is all correlation related to quantum entanglement?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Collapse of the wave function under simultaneous measurement
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad What does it mean to influence a quantum measurement's outcome?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K