Is a Monotonic Function Always Increasing at x=0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter player1_1_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of monotonic functions, specifically examining the behavior of the function y=x^3 at the point x=0. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of increasing functions in relation to the derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of increasing functions and the implications of a zero derivative at a specific point. Questions arise about how to reconcile the definition of increasing functions with the behavior of derivatives.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of definitions and interpretations regarding increasing functions. Some participants suggest that a function can still be considered increasing despite having a zero derivative at a point, while others seek clarity on defining increasing behavior at a single point.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of mathematical definitions and theorems related to monotonicity and derivatives, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of these concepts.

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]y=x^3[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that function is increasing when [tex]f'(x) > 0[/tex] but in [tex]x=0[/tex] there is [tex]f'(x) = 0[/tex], so is function increasing there or not? From definition I know that its increasing there, but how can I connect this with theorem that function is increasing when [tex]f'(x) > 0[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What precisely is your definition of an increasing function?
 
[tex]\forall_{x_1,x_2\in X} \left( x_1 < x_2 \Rightarrow f(x_1)<f(x_2) \right)[/tex]
 
If a function is non-decreasing (weakly increasing), and [tex]f(x_1)=f(x_2)[/tex], [tex]x_1\neq x_2[/tex], then f is constant on [tex][x_1, x_2][/tex], so a single zero of a derivative cannot spoil injectivity.
 
aha, so if derivative is positive and 0 only for countable set of points the function will be increasing?
 
Yes. It can probably be strenghtened a little bit, but that should be enough for all practical purpose.
 
player1_1_1 said:
[tex]\forall_{x_1,x_2\in X} \left( x_1 < x_2 \Rightarrow f(x_1)<f(x_2) \right)[/tex]
With that definition, it makes no sense to talk about a function being "increasing" at a point. It is easy to prove that [itex]y= x^3[/itex] is increasing on any interval.
 
thanks for answers. Is any definition which can define increasing in a point?
 
stupid question, sorry, nvm
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K