I Is a Robust Estimate of Tau Ceti 'f' Albedo Possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nik_2213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Albedo
AI Thread Summary
Tau Ceti 'f' is located at the outer edge of its habitable zone around a stable mid-K star, with its mass highly dependent on orbital alignment. Current albedo estimates rely on the asteroid belt's inclination, but this could change if the belt's structure is affected by planetary dynamics. The discussion raises concerns about the feasibility of obtaining a reliable albedo estimate without more data beyond radial velocity measurements. Without additional information, such as atmospheric modeling or simulations, creating a robust estimate seems unlikely. The consensus is that current limitations hinder accurate albedo assessment for Tau Ceti 'f'.
Nik_2213
Messages
1,218
Reaction score
493
TL;DR Summary
Can there be a robust estimate of tau Ceti 'f' albedo ??
tau Ceti 'f' is an *interesting* planet, on habitable zone's outer border-line around a mostly placid, mid-K star, its Sine(i) mass highly sensitive to orbital plane alignment.

IIRC, current estimates are based on the big asteroid belt's ~35º inclination to line-of-sight. With necessary proviso that estimate may be up-ended if belt is skew, eg due one or more planets' 'Long Tack' per 'Nice Model'...

Given such potential 'gotchas', and pending actual optical resolution, can there be a robust estimate of tau Ceti 'f' albedo ??
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Do we have more than just the radial velocity? If not, I don't see where an albedo estimate would come from.
 
Planetary atmospheric modelling / monte-carlo simulation ??
 
With just the very approximate mass and distance to the star you can't do much. There is nothing a robust estimate could be based on.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top