Is Average Speed a Scalar quantity?

AI Thread Summary
Average speed is classified as a scalar quantity because it is represented solely by a numerical value without direction. In contrast, velocity is a vector quantity that includes both speed and direction. The discussion highlights that the classification of average speed can vary based on the definition of scalar being used. In relativistic contexts, average speed may not be considered a scalar since it can change with different frames of reference. Overall, average speed remains a scalar in conventional terms, defined simply as a number.
shangriphysics
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Is Average Speed a Scalar quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on which definition of scalar you are using. It is not a scalar in the relativistic sense, since the value will change depending on your frame of reference. But it is a scalar in the sense that it is just a number, with no direction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Jedi and Khashishi!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top