Is Bitcoin Mining Contributing to Climate Change?

AI Thread Summary
The advancement of technology, particularly through Bitcoin mining, significantly impacts energy consumption and competition for electricity. Mining operations often locate in areas with cheap electricity, driving up costs and potentially reducing profit margins as demand increases. The profitability of mining is further challenged by periodic halving of Bitcoin rewards, which could slow expansion unless Bitcoin values rise substantially. Current energy usage for Bitcoin transactions is alarmingly high, comparable to that of small countries, and often relies on coal-fired power plants, worsening environmental issues. The urgent need to reduce fossil fuel use, as highlighted by the latest IPCC report, contrasts sharply with the energy demands of Bitcoin mining, indicating a misalignment with global sustainability goals.
Physics news on Phys.org
The bitcoin mining usually takes place in areas of cheap electricity rates because they use so much power. Mining competes with other users of electricity This competition for power will raise the price of electricity and the cost of mining.reducing profit margins. New plants will be required. At least in the near term there seems to be factors that will decrease the rate of expansion of this technology unless more efficient computing hardware are invented.
 
I think the article is a silly extrapolation that tells us something different from what the article is about: it tells us the widespread adoption of Bitcoin at the rates the authors modeled isn't feasible.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
Yes the study has problems for one it is hard to know for sure how much energy is being used since mining is widely distributed and often secretive. But there are factors for both increased and decreased bitcoin expansion. One factor that regulates the amount of energy that bitcoin mining will use is that about every four years the bitcoin reward is cut in half making it less profitable to mine the next cut being 2020. So by 2030 at current bitcoin value the reward for mining is 1/8 of what it is today making the profit margin smaller. So unless the bitcoin value increase significantly mining will slow. As time goes on it takes longer to mine a bitcoin driving up the energy per transaction. Currently it is about 770 kwhrs/transactioin compared to about 1.70 whr/ transactions for one Visa transaction. Already it is estimated that bitcoin transactions use as much power as some small countries like Poland. Bitcoin miners will go to wherever the electricity is cheapest which often is where the power plants are coal fired exacerbating the problem.

Clearly this is not what the world needs at this time. The latest IPCC report say that we must reduce the fossil fuel use by 45% by 2030 to keep global warming under control. That means reducing fossil fuel use by about 4.5% per year starting immediately and hat ain't gong to happen.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top