Is Center-of-Mass Supraliminal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
In Newtonian physics, the center-of-mass of a group of particles depends on the instantaneous positions of the particles, no matter how far apart they are or how fast they are moving relative to each other.

What about under SR? Is the center-of-mass of a group of particles determined instantaneously or is it delayed because of the limitation of the speed of light?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's instantaneous. I don't see how it could even make sense to make it not instantaneous. To determine the speed-of-light delay, you'd have to know the distance to the point in question, but you don't know the point in question yet.
 
The "determining" the center of mass does not involve any object actually moving so is not subject to a light speed limit.
 
What about center of mass versus center of gravity? Don't gravity waves, under GR, travel at the speed of light?
 
It is my understanding that "centre of mass" is, in general, frame-dependent in relativity. All observers agree on the "centre of momentum" frame (the frame in which total momentum is zero) and that the centre of mass moves with the same velocity as the centre of momentum frame, but they may disagree on its location.

Reference: Rindler, W. (2006), Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological, 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-856732-5, p.126, exercise 6.5.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top