Is Charge Conserved in Proton-Proton Collisions at LHC?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conservation of charge in proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Participants explore the implications of charge conservation in the context of particle interactions and the types of charged particles that may remain after collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that charge is conserved in the aftermath of proton collisions, suggesting that the total charge before and after remains the same.
  • There is discussion about the types of charged particles that may exist post-collision, including electrons, muons, taus, positrons, and various mesons and baryons.
  • One participant questions the ability to demonstrate how charge conservation occurs during the collision process, citing the complexity of the strong nuclear force.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while many particles survive into the detector, the exact outcomes of the collision cannot be computed from first principles due to the involved interactions.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of charge non-conservation, particularly in relation to cosmological models like the big bang theory.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the ability to fully test charge conservation in collider experiments, noting limitations in detector coverage and design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the clarity and implications of charge conservation in proton-proton collisions. While some assert its conservation, others question the evidence and methods used to support this claim, indicating a lack of consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of interactions in high-energy collisions, the challenges in achieving full detector coverage, and the reliance on theoretical models that may not be fully tested in practice.

LitleBang
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Is charge conserved in the remains of the collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
Can you clarify that just a little bit, like what permanently existing particles with charge remain after the destruction of the protons?
 
LitleBang said:
Can you clarify that just a little bit, like what permanently existing particles with charge remain after the destruction of the protons?

There will be electrons, muons, taus and their anti particles, and there will be mesons such as pions and baryons such as protons. Depending a bit on what you mean with parmanently existing particles.. say for example the positron would be permanent if it did not interact with anything else.. however it will so it is not permanent. Some of these particles decay on their own, but even the ones that doesn't will have their excistance threatened by the interaction with (for example) the detector.

I believe the charged particles that make it to the detector is almost exclusively electron, positron, muon, anti-muon and pions.
 
kaksmet said:
I believe the charged particles that make it to the detector is almost exclusively electron, positron, muon, anti-muon and pions.

LOTS of particles survive into the detector. Kaons and other mesons make it. So do protons, neutrons and other baryons that are created from various decays.
 
So we start with two +e's and this gets broken into partial charges that wind up after all is said and done with two +e's. Can you show exactly how this happens?
 
LitleBang said:
So we start with two +e's and this gets broken into partial charges that wind up after all is said and done with two +e's. Can you show exactly how this happens?

I am confused by your choice of the word, "show". Two charges come in, and a HUGE amount of stuff goes out. What actually comes out cannot be computed from first principles due to the fact that it involves the strong nuclear force. But whatever comes out, every step of the process conserves charge, and therefore there is no place for charge to not be conserved. Therefore at the end of the day, the total charge in is the same as the total charge out.
 
Please forgive me but it seems your sticking your head in the sand and hoping the problem will go away. One more question and I'll go away. What is the field of those two proton's made? They have this field that must interact with each other, doing work on other charged particles, and yet they never lose energy.
 
LitleBang, your first sentence is insulting. The second shows a profound misunderstanding of what a field is. The third is false.

I would suggest you work on the material in your second and third sentences before developing the attitude shown by your first.
 
  • #10
Van you waltz into this post and claim that charge is conserved without any proof, but I should take your word for it because heaven forbid we have laws that say it is.
 
  • #11
LitleBang said:
Van you waltz into this post and claim that charge is conserved without any proof, but I should take your word for it because heaven forbid we have laws that say it is.

What?
 
  • #12
There is no evidence for a violation of charge conservation whatsoever. Of course it is difficult to provide with quantitative statements based on event-by-event detector reconstructions of heavy ion collisions. I am not an expert in those, but I know that charge conservation is crucial in their models.

At any rate, do you realize how catastrophic charge non-conservation would be for the big-bang model ? Tiny charge violation in the history of the Universe would lead to catastrophic long range forces. This is in fact the best place for you to look at your charge violation, you should obtain generic bounds much stronger that from accelerator experiments. So instead of complaining when someone points to your misconceptions, how about you provide us with a quantitative estimate from cosmology ?
 
  • #13
Specific to the question, its not clear to me you could 100% test charge conservation in collider. You'd need full 4-pi coverage, and that can't happen if for no other reason you need the beam to come through.

Of course charge conservation may have been tested once or twice in the past in setups specifically designed to do such things... Possibly LHC's detectors were designed for other reasons...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K