Is commutativity transitive for non degenerate eigenvalues?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob900
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
bob900
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have three hermitian operators A,B,C each with only non degenerate eigenvalues.

If A and B commute, then for each eigenvector of A we can find an eigenvector of B, and because the eigenvalues are non degenerate the mapping is one to one. If B and C commute we can do the same. This implies that A and C also have a one to one mapping of their eigenbases, and so A and C commute.

But in general we know that the commutation relation is not transitive for some arbitrary set of operators {X,Y,Z}. Is this because some of them might have degenerate eigenvalues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose [X,Y] = 0 and [Y,Z] = 0, and suppose transitivity fails. That means that within some eigenspace of Y, [X,Z] ≠ 0, implying that the eigenspace is at least two-dimensional.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top