Is Coulomb's law valid in a non-inertial frame?

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's law does not hold in a non-inertial frame, even if charges remain static and the observer does not move. In such frames, the Coulomb force field becomes distorted due to fictitious forces. Specifically, under constant proper acceleration, radiation from static charges is not observed, but the field's distortion invalidates Coulomb's law. Therefore, the conclusion is that the expected Coulomb force will not be experienced as it would in an inertial frame. The discussion highlights the limitations of classical physics in non-inertial contexts.
xxxyyy
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Hi,
I was wondering, if the charges do not move in a non inertial frame and I don't move too in this frame, will I see the same Coulomb force, some fictitious forces and radiation coming from these static charges?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A.T. said:
just a distorted Coulomb force field
Note that the distorted field means that Coulomb’s law is not valid. So the short but correct answer to the OP’s question is “no”.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Thread 'Why measure the speed of light in one direction?'

It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
View full post »

Similar threads

A Exploring the Electric Field of a Moving Charged Spherical Shell
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Coulomb's law taken to the extreme
Replies
44
Views
2K
I Physics domain analysis of Voltage drop in series resistor
Replies
7
Views
2K
How does permittivity in Coulomb's law work?
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
Replies
5
Views
859
Coulomb's law, electrostatics?
Replies
42
Views
4K
I Galilean transformation of non-inertial frame
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Magnetic field as result of length contraction
Replies
20
Views
4K
Magnetic Force and Frame of Reference
Replies
3
Views
2K
Lorentz force in different frames of reference
Replies
12
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top