Is Coulomb's law valid in a non-inertial frame?

Click For Summary
Coulomb's law does not hold in a non-inertial frame, even if charges remain static and the observer does not move. In such frames, the Coulomb force field becomes distorted due to fictitious forces. Specifically, under constant proper acceleration, radiation from static charges is not observed, but the field's distortion invalidates Coulomb's law. Therefore, the conclusion is that the expected Coulomb force will not be experienced as it would in an inertial frame. The discussion highlights the limitations of classical physics in non-inertial contexts.
xxxyyy
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Hi,
I was wondering, if the charges do not move in a non inertial frame and I don't move too in this frame, will I see the same Coulomb force, some fictitious forces and radiation coming from these static charges?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A.T. said:
just a distorted Coulomb force field
Note that the distorted field means that Coulomb’s law is not valid. So the short but correct answer to the OP’s question is “no”.
 

Similar threads

A Exploring the Electric Field of a Moving Charged Spherical Shell
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Coulomb's law taken to the extreme
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
I About the notion of non-standard inertial frame
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
I Physics domain analysis of Voltage drop in series resistor
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
How does permittivity in Coulomb's law work?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Coulomb's law, electrostatics?
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
I Galilean transformation of non-inertial frame
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Magnetic field as result of length contraction
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K