Is dark energy constant to emtpy space?

AI Thread Summary
Dark energy is currently understood to be a constant on cosmological scales, contributing to the accelerated expansion of the universe. However, its effects are negligible at local levels, making it difficult to measure or understand fully. The concept of dark energy raises questions about its constancy and whether it influences atomic structures, but evidence suggests it operates primarily at intergalactic distances. The dynamics of dark energy remain largely unknown, with significant uncertainties surrounding its origins and behavior. Overall, while it appears constant in current models, the true nature of dark energy is still a major scientific mystery.
azzkika
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Is dark energy constant to emtpy space??

i've just been reading about dark energy on a site, and it seems it's quite a riddle at present.

it stated that the dark energy of space is constant and that the universe is speeding up as the more space produced increases the amount of dark energy, at the same time gravities pull is weakening as denseness is reduced.

i was wondering is it really constant?? and if so should it not reside in space on the atomic level as well as the cosmological?? and so shouldn't we all become gradualy bigger until the point of the 'big rip'??

the site was hubble.org, and as informative as it was it's left me confused as most things do these days.

i know you guys have answers for every questin I've put so far, so i look forward to your replies. lol
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Dark energy is completely tiny at the local level (vacuum), and only really can be felt on the order of say intergalactic scales and greater. We are talking about many, many orders of magnitude smaller than anything previously measured before in the history of science. In fact its so small, its a huge problem, b/c there is almost nothing we can think off that will give us much detail about the exact dynamics or about how such a small number could possibly arise.

As for whether its constant or not, or the exact details. Well, the short answer is we don't know exactly. In the standard picture and at least to good approximation it seems that way (hence it appears as a cosmological constant term in Einsteins equations) but the bottomline is its still a huge unknown and no one knows exactly.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top