Is Dark Matter and Dark Energy Present on Earth?

AI Thread Summary
Dark Matter and Dark Energy, which constitute approximately 20% and 70% of the universe's mass respectively, are theorized to be present on Earth but are undetectable due to their lack of interaction with ordinary matter. Despite their abundance in the universe, their distribution is extremely diffuse, with estimates suggesting that Earth contains only about 5000 kg of dark matter. This low density means that dark matter does not clump together like ordinary matter, making it challenging to prove or disprove its existence. Observations of stars moving at high speeds imply the presence of unseen mass, supporting the dark matter hypothesis. Ultimately, while dark matter and dark energy are prevalent in the universe, their elusive nature complicates direct detection on Earth.
BruceNakagawa
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If Dark Matter and Dark Energy are so abundant wasn't to be expected that they should be found on Earth?

We can find elements such as uranium on our planet, which is one of the rarest elements fused on Stars, Dark Matter being estimated to account for roughly 20% of the total mass of the universe and Dark Energy about 70%, shouldn't we expect to find it on Earth, the Moon, Mars or orbiting the Sun?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Dark matter and dark energy are all around. However neither seems to interact with ordinary matter so they are essentially undetectable.
 
mathman said:
Dark matter and dark energy are all around. However neither seems to interact with ordinary matter so they are essentially undetectable.

So how can we ever prove/disprove their existence?
 
Some stars move at speeds that should rip the galaxy apart; there is not enough measured mass to supply the gravity needed to hold the galaxy together.

These high rotational speeds suggest that the galaxy contains more mass than was calculated. Scientists theorize that, if the galaxy was surrounded by a halo of unseen matter, the galaxy could remain stable at such high rotational speeds.

source: http://www.eclipse.net/~cmmiller/DM/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BruceNakagawa said:
If Dark Matter and Dark Energy are so abundant wasn't to be expected that they should be found on Earth?

We can find elements such as uranium on our planet, which is one of the rarest elements fused on Stars, Dark Matter being estimated to account for roughly 20% of the total mass of the universe and Dark Energy about 70%, shouldn't we expect to find it on Earth, the Moon, Mars or orbiting the Sun?

Dark matter would be evenly distributed as a halo around the galaxy and due to its properties, wouldn't "clump" together like planets and stars do.

To paint a picture of what I mean, imagine that 4 times the entire mass of the solar system where spread out uniformly in a sphere with the radius of the Oort cloud. You would end up with a density of 4.56e-9 kg/ km³.

In other words, the entire volume of the Earth would contain ~5000 kg of dark matter at this density. And this would be spread out evenly throughout the entire Earth. Compare this to the 35,709 metric tons of Uranium processed per year from just the upper layers of the Earth's crust.

And this vastly overestimates the density of dark matter in the galaxy. There may be a lot of it, but it is spread very thinly.
 
Meanwhile, the "mass" of dark energy in the Earth would be about 10 milligrams.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top