Is ΔE the Same for Spontaneous Isobaric and Reversible Isothermal Expansions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oferon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of internal energy changes (ΔE) in two different gas expansion processes: spontaneous isobaric and reversible isothermal. Participants explore the implications of these processes on work and heat, while questioning the relationship between the initial and final states of the gas.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the two processes and their effects on internal energy, questioning whether ΔE remains the same despite differing paths taken to reach the same final state. Some express confusion about the implications of state functions and the role of heat and work in each process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the mechanics of each process and raising questions about the assumptions involved. There is recognition that while the initial and final states may be the same, the paths taken involve different thermodynamic considerations, leading to varied heat and work interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarity in defining the system and processes involved, as well as the importance of understanding the thermal equilibrium conditions during the expansions. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying thermodynamic principles to different expansion scenarios.

oferon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have a cylinder with gas in it. I can make it expand in two ways: spontaneously isobaric process or reversible isothermal process.

I understand W and Q for each process are different, but is ΔE the same? If not - why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are more than two ways (mechanical processes) for expanding the gas.
I think you need to more carefully describe the system you are looking at.
As it stands, it is not clear what you are asking.
 
I'm sure there are more than two ways, but I'm asking about these two.

First is to relase the piston at once (getting a new constant external pressure).
Second is to release it in very small steps (thus temprature remains constant).

As far as I see we have the same Ef and Ei, because it should not matter in which way we reached those states, so delta E should be the same. I know I'm wrong, question is why.
 
oferon said:
I'm sure there are more than two ways, but I'm asking about these two.

First is to relase the piston at once (getting a new constant external pressure).
Second is to release it in very small steps (thus temprature remains constant).

As far as I see we have the same Ef and Ei, because it should not matter in which way we reached those states, so delta E should be the same. I know I'm wrong, question is why.
See .. you said nothing about a piston before ;)

The first is a free expansion - the gas is not in thermal equilibrium with itself through the expansion. The second is just where care is taken to stay in a well-defined state throughout the expansion.

So what was the question?
 
The spontaneous isobaric process occurs in almost two separate phases, in which the gas first rapidly expands, and, at the end of this phase its temperature has dropped. After this first phase, if the cylinder is being held in contact with a temperature bath at the initial temperature, the gas will heat up at essentially constant pressure to the initial temperature. The final state will be the same as the isothermal reversible expansion, so the change in internal energy will be the same for both processes. But the heat added and the work done will not be the same for the two processes. Only their difference will be the same.
 
Chestermiller said:
The spontaneous isobaric process occurs in almost two separate phases, in which the gas first rapidly expands, and, at the end of this phase its temperature has dropped. After this first phase, if the cylinder is being held in contact with a temperature bath at the initial temperature, the gas will heat up at essentially constant pressure to the initial temperature. The final state will be the same as the isothermal reversible expansion, so the change in internal energy will be the same for both processes. But the heat added and the work done will not be the same for the two processes. Only their difference will be the same.

But on both processes I start with same Pi and Vi, and end up with same Pf and Vf.
I thought E is a state function, so it should not matter how I reached from initial to final state.
If it's an ideal gas, then for same P and V I must get same T, regardless of any bath...
What am I missing?
 
oferon said:
But on both processes I start with same Pi and Vi, and end up with same Pf and Vf.
I thought E is a state function, so it should not matter how I reached from initial to final state.
If it's an ideal gas, then for same P and V I must get same T, regardless of any bath...
What am I missing?

By a spontaneous isobaric expansion process, I've been assuming you mean that the pressure of the surroundings is held fixed at Pf.

In the isobaric process, you need to add heat to get to the same final volume and final temperature (equal to the initial temperature). The amount of heat you have to add is Pf Δ V. This has to come from outside the system, and can be provided by a heat bath at temperature T. This heat added is just equal to the work done on the surroundings, so ΔU = 0.

In the reversible isothermal process, the amount of work you do is the integral of P dV. This is RT ln (Vf/Vi). This is also the amount of heat you have to add to maintain isothermal operation, and has to come from outside the system, and can be provided by a heat bath at temperature T. In this situation, ΔU is likewise equal to zero.

So, in both cases, the change in internal energy is zero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K