Is E = E(max)cos(kx-wt) a Solution to Maxwell's Derived Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell's equation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying whether the expression E = E(max)cos(kx-wt) is a solution to Maxwell's derived equation related to electromagnetic wave propagation. The subject area includes wave equations and electromagnetic theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss substituting variables such as k and w, and some express confusion about how to equate the left and right sides of the wave equation. Others mention the need for partial differentiation and question the interpretation of "solving both sides" of the equation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their understanding of the wave equation and the necessary steps to verify the solution. Some have offered guidance on differentiation, while others are still grappling with the terminology and concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the wording of the problem and the steps required to verify the equation, which may be impacting participants' understanding and progress.

maon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm new here. I have a question. How do you verify that: E = E(max)cos(kx-wt) is a solution to Maxwell's derived equation:
((d^2)E/dx^2) = e(epsilon nought)u(permitivity of free space) x (d^2)E/dx^2. Thanks.
What I first did was to substitute k = 2pi/lambda, w = 2pi(f). Then I set 2pi(f) as 2pi/lamda x c. Taking 2pi/lambda out and times cos equals 1/lambda. Now I'm stuck.
Mat
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To verify the function satisfied the wave equation, you simply put in there. Or look what the left side of the wave equation is for the given E, then calculate the right side and see if they are equal.
 
I'm still confused in terms of how to get the sides to equal each other. How do I eliminate the minus and the cos?
 
The only relation you need to use is [itex]\omega/k=c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0 \mu_0}}[/itex].

So you have [itex]E(x,t) = E_{max}\cos(kx-wt)[/itex].

Now what's [itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}E(x,t)[/itex] and what's [itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}E(x,t)[/itex]?

So does E(x,t) verify the equation?
 
I'm sorry I'm a bit lost here. So you do partial differentiation for E(x,t) = Emax(cos(kx-wt)) for x and t? Thank you for your patience.
 
Well, isn't that what the wave-equation says?

[tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}E(x,t)=\epsilon_0 \mu_0 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}E(x,t)[/tex]

What exactly is it you don't understand? Is it the question itself or the way to go about solving the problem? My guess is that you don't understand the question.
 
Thanks, I think I got it. So you derivative for B and E and solve both sides. I couldn't get the question, it was worded kinda weird. Thanks for your help.
 
What answer did you get?
 
maon said:
Thanks, I think I got it. So you derivative for B and E and solve both sides. I couldn't get the question, it was worded kinda weird. Thanks for your help.
Actually, I would think you were the one with the "weird" wording. I have no idea what "solve both sides" means! I know how to solve equations and I even know how to solve problems in general but I don't know what is meant by solving a "side" of an equation!


Suppose you had a problem that asked to show that x= 3 is a solution to x2- 5x= -6. What would you do? (I hope you would not say "solve the equation.")
 
  • #10
I just did a dervative twice for E = Emaxcos(kx-wt) and for B = Bmaxcos(kx-wt) in terms of x and t. Then I equaled the double derivative of E = Emaxcos(kx-wt) in terms of x with terms of t and solve to get light = light. Same thing for B equation too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K