B Is energy transferred as a wave or particle in classical physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quote from Resnick's book regarding energy transport in classical physics, specifically questioning whether energy can be stored in an electric field and how it is transported. It highlights that while classical physics states energy is transported by waves or particles, the Poynting vector indicates energy can also be carried through static fields in DC circuits without the presence of waves. Participants argue that energy is indeed stored in static electric fields and can be transported by electromagnetic fields or currents. The conversation also touches on the duality of particles and waves at the sub-atomic level, particularly concerning electrons. Overall, the debate emphasizes the nuances of energy transport beyond the classical definitions.
Naman Jain Kota
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I read a line in the book "Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei, and particles" by resnick

The line is "in classical physics energy is either Transported by waves or by particles"

I have doubt is it correct, like we say eneegy is stored in electric field, is electric field considered as wave.

And is the statement true without any exception (classical physics)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also would disagree with the statement. For example in a DC circuit there are no waves, but the Poynting vector shows that energy is transported through the static field.
 
  • Like
Likes Naman Jain Kota
Energy is certainly stored in a static electric field, but if it has to be transported, it has to be either by EM waves, or through a current carried by charged particles (electrons)
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
Energy is certainly stored in a static electric field, but if it has to be transported, it has to be either by EM waves, or through a current carried by charged particles (electrons)
Nope. Calculate the Poynting vector for a DC circuit. There are no waves and the energy is carried by the field not the current.

http://depa.fquim.unam.mx/amyd/arch...ia_a_otros_elementos_de_un_circuito_20867.pdf

https://www.tu-braunschweig.de/Medien-DB/ifdn-physik/ajp000782.pdf
 
I know this is late, and I might be a little off the comprehension track, but in that quotation from "Quantum physics ...etc." by Resnick, isn't the author alluding to the duality ... i.e. does an electron (functioning in the same manner as a photon of light) behave as a wave or a particle at the sub-atomic level.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top