Is Eternal Self-Awareness Inevitable in an Infinite Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fcpf
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the probability of self-aware entities emerging in an expansive universe, which contains approximately 100 billion galaxies and may be infinite. It posits that given the vastness of the universe, the occurrence of self-awareness should be considered inevitable over time, despite the lack of continuity or memory between different instances of self-awareness. The argument acknowledges that while the probability of such events may be small, especially in a finite universe, the potential for new self-aware entities remains. However, there is skepticism regarding the inevitability of this phenomenon, emphasizing that there is no direct connection between current self-aware beings and future instances of self-awareness, regardless of time or space. The discussion raises questions about the nature of probability and the implications for the existence of self-aware entities throughout the universe's lifespan.
fcpf
For an entity to be born and recognize itself as a self-aware entity ("I exist"), there had to be a non-zero probability that such event occurs. In a universe which is known to host some 100 billions of galaxies - and which possibly is infinite or even just one universe among an infinite number of universes - wouldn't that make sense then to say that the probability of such event occurring again is inevitable?
Obviously, there won't be any relation between the 'I' in the present and the next 'I' in which self-awareness occurs (doesn't have to be human), and no continuity of memory. That means that the new entity won't have a perception of any time lapse between the 2 events, whether it be 5 mn or 1 million Earth years. In that sense, can we say that any self-aware entity like me and you will inevitably experience self-awareness for as long as the universe sustain life?
I wonder if my reasoning on probability makes sense, or whether I fall into some kind of flying teapot fallacy... I'm interested in reading your thoughts on this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
wouldn't that make sense then to say that the probability of such event occurring again is inevitable?
The probability could be tiny, and even decreasing with increasing age of the universe. In a finite universe, the expected number of future self-aware entities can be very small (<<1).
In that sense, can we say that any self-aware entity like me and you will inevitably experience self-awareness for as long as the universe sustain life?
I don't think so, as there is no relation between us and some self-awareness far away in time or space.
 
Sorry, this thread doesn't meet our posting criteria.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top