Is Falling to Earth's Core 42 or 38 Minutes?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RandyD123
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the time it would take to fall to the center of the Earth, with specific reference to claims of 38 minutes and 11 seconds versus the traditionally cited 42 minutes. Participants explore the implications of these figures, the assumptions behind them, and the relevance of the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a Gizmodo article claiming the fall time is 38 minutes and 11 seconds, questioning its validity and significance.
  • Others suggest that while the new figure seems reasonable, the framing of the issue in the article is misleading, particularly regarding the assumptions of constant density and spherical shape.
  • One participant emphasizes that the 42-minute figure is an approximate answer used for educational purposes, not a definitive solution, and that real calculations would require numerical methods due to the Earth's varying density.
  • There is mention that the actual time to fall would depend on the starting point on the Earth's surface and that the effect of the Earth's rotation is not considered in the claims made.
  • A participant highlights that the time to fall varies with the depth of the tunnel, approaching 42 minutes for short tunnels and 38 minutes and 11 seconds for longer tunnels, indicating a nuanced understanding of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the 38-minute claim and the assumptions behind both figures. There is no consensus on which time is more accurate or relevant, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions of uniform density and spherical shape, which do not accurately reflect the Earth's actual structure. The discussion also notes the complexity introduced by varying density and the Earth's rotation, which complicates the calculations further.

RandyD123
Messages
66
Reaction score
7
There is a website (Gizmodo) now claiming that the answer to the question: how long it would take to fall to the center of the Earth is only 38 minutes and 11 sec.

First is it right and second does it really matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it matters to you, you can compute it :). To me it sure doesn't, but it seems broadly the right order of magnitude at least if you assume a hole to the center.
 
RandyD123 said:
There is a website (Gizmodo) now claiming that the answer to the question: how long it would take to fall to the center of the Earth is only 38 minutes and 11 sec.

First is it right and second does it really matter?
The logic behind his new figure seems impeccable.
 
RandyD123 said:
claiming that the answer to the question: how long it would take to fall to the center of the Earth is only 38 minutes and 11 sec.

The answer looks reasonable to me (I have not done a detailed calculation), but the way the article frames the whole issue is bogus. The article correctly notes that the "standard" answer to this question, 42 minutes, assumes that the Earth is a sphere of constant density. (It's notable, btw, that the article, after going on and on about how the constant density assumption is wrong, says nothing at all about how the sphere assumption is also wrong. More on that below.) However, nobody ever actually believed that the Earth was a sphere of constant density. The reason that assumption is made when this problem is assigned to undergraduates is that it makes the calculation tractable: you can get a closed-form solution. For a sphere whose density varies with depth (and even more so for an oblate spheroid whose density varies in complicated ways), there is no closed-form solution; you have to compute the answer numerically, and that's beyond the scope of your average undergraduate physics class.

So the title claim of the article, that "scientists can't agree" on this question, is, to put it bluntly, bullshit. Scientists never claimed that the uniform density answer of 42 minutes was the "right" answer, just that it was an approximate answer that was easy for undergraduates to calculate. What's more, the article writer seems to think that the answer of 38 minutes and 11 seconds is somehow "right"; but that's not really true either, because, as I noted above, the calculation still assumes that the Earth is a sphere (at least, as far as I can tell from the abstract of the paper, it does), whereas the actual Earth is an oblate spheroid. The actual time it would take to fall to the center of the actual Earth will depend on where on the surface you start from. (And this is all the more true when you include the effect of the Earth's rotation, which is also ignored in the article and is not taken into account in the paper, as far as I can tell.)

And for extra fun, the article writer not only puts a bogus interpretation on what he does write about, but actually misses the most important point raised in the paper! From the abstract:

"The time taken to fall along a straight line between any two points is no longer independent of distance but interpolates between 42 min for short trips and 38 min for long trips."

Here's what that means: for a uniform density sphere, it takes 42 minutes to fall through a tunnel from the surface to the deepest point, not just for a tunnel through the center, but for a tunnel between any two points on the surface. In other words, if the Earth were of uniform density and we dug a straight tunnel from New York to London (which obviously will go nowhere near the center of the Earth), it would take 42 minutes to free-fall through that tunnel from either end to its deepest point. (Yes, this would not be a "fall" straight down; think of something like a rail car running on frictionless rails with no engine, so the only motive power is gravity.) But, for the actual Earth, this time varies with the depth of the tunnel: it approaches 42 minutes for "short" tunnels (tunnels whose deepest point is near the surface), and approaches 38 minutes 11 seconds for "long" tunnels (whose deepest point approaches the center of the Earth).

(If you read the fine print, it also turns out that these tunnels, as they get deeper, are also no longer straight; their deepest point is deeper than a straight tunnel between the same two surface points would be.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K