Is force times acceleration equal to power?

AI Thread Summary
Power is defined as energy per time, which translates to work done per time. The discussion explores the relationship between power, force, and acceleration, confirming that power can be expressed as force multiplied by acceleration, adjusted by a constant. The equation also relates power to mean piston speed and rate of rotation in mechanical systems. The participants clarify the concepts, leading to a consensus on the correct formulation. Understanding these relationships is crucial for applications in physics and engineering.
renjith_p
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
power = p(max)*Area*mean piston speed*rate of rotation*constant
power = p(max)*Area*acceleration*constant
power = force*acceleration*constant

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi renjith_p! :smile:

i'm not following that :confused:

power = energy per time = work done per time

= force "dot" distance per time

= force "dot" velocity​
 
Oops! that was so stupid of me :) You're right.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top