Is Gas Flame Better than Charcoal Fire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Gas
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparative advantages of gas flames versus charcoal fires in the context of traditional Japanese knife making. Participants explore aspects of heat control, temperature stability, and the influence of tradition and experience on the choice of fuel in metalworking processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that gas flames provide more consistent and controllable heat compared to charcoal fires, which may fluctuate in temperature.
  • Others suggest that the proficiency and experience of the craftsman with charcoal may play a significant role in their ability to control heat effectively.
  • A participant raises the idea that the adiabatic flame temperature of gas might be too high for certain applications, requiring specialized equipment that may not be necessary with charcoal.
  • It is noted that charcoal may provide more uniform heating due to its ability to envelop the workpiece, while gas flames may not achieve the same level of even heating.
  • Some contributors mention the potential benefits of charcoal in terms of carbon content, which could affect the hardness and wear resistance of the metal being worked.
  • There is a discussion about the traditional techniques used in Japanese sword making, including the importance of visual cues in the heating process, which may be more easily managed with charcoal.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of gas combustion byproducts, such as water vapor, on the quality of the knife being produced.
  • Participants reflect on the historical context of knife making and whether modern techniques can replicate traditional methods effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of gas versus charcoal in knife making, with no consensus reached. Some support the advantages of gas flames, while others emphasize the benefits of charcoal, particularly in traditional contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the capabilities of gas and charcoal, the experience level of the craftsman, and the specific requirements of the knife-making process, which remain unresolved.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
Yes, that's rhetorical, we all know I can't be wrong.

I was just watching Anthony Bourdain on tv and they were discussing a Japanese knife maker. They said that the knife maker used a traditional charcoal fire in making the blade because he could control the heat better than with a gas flame.

I don't see how that can be true. With a gas flame, you can keep it fairly constant. With a charcoal fire the heat would constantly fluctuate. You can also immedieately change a gas flame so that you can go up or down in temperature. You cannot do this with a charcoal fire. There is just no way you can achieve the accuracy and consistency of a charcoal fire in comparison with gas.

Am I wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I say you're right. Not only can you control the amount fuel on a moment's notice with gas, but the variability of charcoal must be much greater than that of natural gas.

Maybe charcoal is just what he's used to - people hate change.
 
It's tradition, and people tend to pay more for tradition than quality.
 
Evo said:
Yes, that's rhetorical, we all know I can't be wrong.

I was just watching Anthony Bourdain on tv and they were discussing a Japanese knife maker. They said that the knife maker used a traditional charcoal fire in making the blade because he could control the heat better than with a gas flame.

I don't see how that can be true. With a gas flame, you can keep it fairly constant. With a charcoal fire the heat would constantly fluctuate. You can also immedieately change a gas flame so that you can go up or down in temperature. You cannot do this with a charcoal fire. There is just no way you can achieve the accuracy and consistency of a charcoal fire in comparison with gas.

Am I wrong?

That depends on how much practice he has using charcoal and how much practice he has using gas.

Proficiency and experience with the tools that the person is using is probably a bigger factor than just the raw capability of the tools themselves.
 
Perhaps it is a matter of the adiabatic flame temperature of gas being too high and people not making many devices to adjust the fuel-air mixture? He'd need a custom-designed furnace to do something he can do himself with charcoal.
 
If you have a large pile of charcoal I'd say the internal temperature is probably pretty stable.
 
As grant said, this is more a matter of tradition and probably of experience. If this guy has inherited since 10 generations how to make good Japanese knives in charcoal, and has been doing it for more than 40 years, chances are that he can make very good knives that way, and moreover he's probably convinced there's some kind of chi or whatever half-magical force helping him forge the best of knives.
If he has to alter about everything he knows, worships etc, and use a new technology, he'll probably won't be making good knives - and moreover he'd be convinced he'd make bad knives, denigrating his ancestors. So he won't probably even be motivated to improve upon knife making with gas.
On the other hand, he can hardly confess that, so he needs to rationalize away his sticking to charcoal.
Also, it might be that variable temperature is actually what is needed for a thermal treatment (annealing ?) of the steel.
 
May also have to do with radiation heat of which charcoal fire has plenty of, while a gas flame works best by in direct contact by conduction.
 
I think its because when hardening the blades the smith has to heat the sword slowly and carefully to achieve the correct structure changes of the metal. I don't think that could be achieved as well with gas. You'd probably heat it very quickly and not very uniformly.
 
  • #10
Plus it says HE can control the heat better with charcoal. That doesn't necessarily imply that charcoal is a more controllable heat, just that the smith is more familiar with it and better at working with it. Though, I was thinking along the lines of Kurdt's point too, that it might be the rate of heating. And, I'm not sure if you can get much differences in temperatures of gas flames without a lot of tinkering with them. Perhaps even the gradient of temperatures across a bed of charcoal would be useful in this craft.
 
  • #11
I saw a Nova show about japanese sword making. At one point in the process they have to cover all the windows and turn off all the lights and the sword maker keeps pulling the sword out of the coals and putting it back in. He's looking for an exact shade of orange. That's probably much easier to control with a charcoal fire because he can add air to heat it up if he wants, and every part of the sword gets the same amount of heat. With gas you've only got the one temperature for the most part and the only way to not get the sword so hot is to lower the flame, so you can't really have a uniform temperature over the whole sword
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Is there some mysterious art that has been lost and modern day metal workers can not reproduce, i some how doubt it, it is just that mass production has taken over.
 
  • #13
If the knifemaker puts the blade in a bed of charcoal, he'll get even heating of the blade from the outside to the inside. One of the things that the Japanese have mastered is the construction of blades that are very hard (almost to the point of brittleness) on the outside with a core that is softer and more resistant to breakage. Maybe the knifemaker needs charcoal to pull this off.

I have made a few knives using old blades. Get an old blade (saw blade, industrial blade of some type) and soften it so that it can be worked. Shape the new blade from the material, drill holes for mounting scales, etc, heat-treat, mount and sharpen. What's the hardest part to get right? Heat-treating, by far. I was using torches for heating, and it's very difficult to get consistent results that way. An older fellow I knew made knives using similar techniques, but he had an electrically-heated muffle furnace for heat-treating (he was also a goldsmith) and he got superior results.

Edit: Here is the hardest-to-heat-treat knife I ever made. It's a simple trout-and-bird knife with micarta scales. I made the blade out of a piece of Hyde industrial blade (paper-machine tail cutter). The problem is that the blade is so slim that it was tough to get even heating. After MANY tries, I finally got a blade that is flexible like a stiff spring, with a hard edge that is tough to sharpen.
knife.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #14
The gas flame provides a constant temperature - in the flame. The matter however is to heat the workpiece which requires conduction of heat into the piece and the interaction between workpiece and flame may not be a controlled (constant) as that obtained by immersing the workpiece in a bed of hot charcoal.

Charcoal also provides carbon to the iron, and it is the iron-carbides which provide hardness and wear resistance to iron. Knife and sword makers set the temperature to form martensite in the steel.

I saw the NOVA program on sword making. It is an impressive art. We discussed it somewhere on PF.

Here's an interesting site - http://www.knife-making-supplies.net/japanese-kitchen-knives.html

http://www.knife-making-supplies.net/hardening-tempering-knife-blades.html
 
  • #15
One other thing that is definitely different with charcoal v gas combustion is that gas produces much more water vapor. I don't know if that would affect the construction of a knife or not.
 
  • #16
wolram said:
Is there some mysterious art that has been lost and modern day metal workers can not reproduce, i some how doubt it, it is just that mass production has taken over.

The thing about Japanese swords is that the metal is folded many times, so you can get a really sharp edge out of it, and also like turbo said, they are hard on the outside and softer on the inside, so that you can slice easy but not have it break as easily.

Most people don't need that kind of quality and it would be pretty hard to mass produce.
 
  • #17
I was under the impression that the folding was only to make the steel used more homoginised, since the techniques to produce steel at the time left impurities and uneven carbon distribution throughout. By folding and hammering the metal many times the impurities were removed and the carbon content was distributed more evenly.
 
  • #18
I was grilling up some hot dogs and cheeseburgers (I heard that charcoal broiled hamburgers cause cancer, so I always add the cheese) and I had some sheet metal lying around so I figured why not see for myself. So I folded over the metal, beat it down, put it over the charcoal and repeated this process. I noticed that the flat surface of the metal was just right for flipping the burgers, so I picked it up. It turns out that the handle on a knife is there for more than just convenience when stabbing people. It also prevents your hand from heating evenly with the metal. To say that the metal was 144 degrees F would be a gross underestimate. Now I have a decoration on my palm like that guy in Indiana Jones and I am definitely digging in the wrong place.

After I bandaged up my hand, I got out the gas grill. I sparked that baby up and let the sheet metal fly. This is the way to go folks. I was heating, folding, beating, and grilling with a very even and controllable heat. I had served the last red hot just as the knife was taking final form. I got too cocky though and when I flipped the knife with the spatula, it came down truely, but inconveniently on my foot, severing an otherwise perfectly good toe.

I agree with Evo that gas is better. I can get by on nine toes OK, but the pain in my hand whenever I grasp anything is a show stopper.
 
  • #19
Astronuc said:
The gas flame provides a constant temperature - in the flame. The matter however is to heat the workpiece which requires conduction of heat into the piece and the interaction between workpiece and flame may not be a controlled (constant) as that obtained by immersing the workpiece in a bed of hot charcoal.

Charcoal also provides carbon to the iron, and it is the iron-carbides which provide hardness and wear resistance to iron. Knife and sword makers set the temperature to form martensite in the steel.

I saw the NOVA program on sword making. It is an impressive art. We discussed it somewhere on PF.

Here's an interesting site - http://www.knife-making-supplies.net/japanese-kitchen-knives.html

http://www.knife-making-supplies.net/hardening-tempering-knife-blades.html


I remember that about carbon too----it may be something similar in that some materials are heat treated in different ways--some in oils, some in water, etc.
 
  • #20
Kurdt said:
I was under the impression that the folding was only to make the steel used more homoginised, since the techniques to produce steel at the time left impurities and uneven carbon distribution throughout. By folding and hammering the metal many times the impurities were removed and the carbon content was distributed more evenly.

You're also pounding in vast amounts of Chi.
 
  • #21
Heating and pounding is an example of hot working which does homogenize the microstructure and also decreases the grain size.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
WarPhalange said:
You're also pounding in vast amounts of Chi.

like those Cheez-it commercials?



----the whole process seems to be important to the end product---like cooking on a bar-b-que compared to in a microwave----it may be the almost same product in the end, but it will have a different provenance/artistry
 
  • #23
Is Chi not a Chinese concept that the Japanese are not fond of?
 
  • #24
I've watched Japanese sword making before and it was for a lot of reasons, the variances in heat, carbon, etc... that they used the coal.

On the show they said specifically that it was easier to control the heat with charcoal than with a gas flame. If that was true chefs would be making bechemel sauce over charcoal fires and not gas stoves. :-p I think they really dumbed it down to something Anthony could say in a one liner. The show wasn't about knife making, after all.

Great show on Japanese culture featuring Iron Chef Masaharu Morimoto with Bourdain.

Thanks everyone for the answers!
 
  • #25
Kurdt said:
Is Chi not a Chinese concept that the Japanese are not fond of?

What you have to understand about Japan is that every time the Japanese invaded China (which was often), they'd take something for themselves, a few Kanji here or there, a concept or something, etc. I believe Kimono were similarly stolen, as were numbers. For example, the "Japanese" way to count would be garbageotsu, futatsu, mitsu, yotsu, and I forget how it goes from there. The Chinese way is ichi, ni, san, shi, go, etc, which the Japanese adopted.

In Japan it is called "Ki" and it is very prominent in crappy watered-down Japanese Martial Arts here in the US.

It's also pretty big in Japanese Martial Arts in general. It's originally a Chinese concept, yes, but the Japanese have it too.
 
  • #26
Evo said:
On the show they said specifically that it was easier to control the heat with charcoal than with a gas flame.
It's likely that they dumbed-down the concept that it's easier to control heat transfer to the tool with charcoal. Lots of custom knife makers work with small charcoal forges.
 
  • #27
WarPhalange said:
What you have to understand about Japan is that every time the Japanese invaded China (which was often), they'd take something for themselves, a few Kanji here or there, a concept or something, etc. I believe Kimono were similarly stolen, as were numbers. For example, the "Japanese" way to count would be garbageotsu, futatsu, mitsu, yotsu, and I forget how it goes from there. The Chinese way is ichi, ni, san, shi, go, etc, which the Japanese adopted.
Yikes. The Japanese never invaded China before the late 19th century, long after Kanji, Kimonos, and numbers came to Japan. I'm not sure about Kimono, but the Kanji were brought to Japan by Korean Buddhists escaping civil war during a period of 300 years from about 300 to 600 AD. At that time the Japanese language lacked a writing system. Through a long period of experimentation, they adapted the Chinese writing system to the Japanese language. Your description of counting though is not bad. The earlier Japanese way was as you say. The modern Mandarin Chinese is I, er, san, si, wu and the ancient version of this is the source of the Japanese ichi, ni, san, shi, go. Both systems are currently in use. You can compare this to the mingling of French into the English language as the result of the influx of French nobility after the battle of Hastings. We too have two words for many things.
 
  • #28
jimmysnyder said:
You can compare this to the mingling of French into the English language as the result of the influx of French nobility after the battle of Hastings. We too have two words for many things.
French nobility brought in social conventions that stratified many synonyms, too. They brought in the word "beef" because they never interacted with kine (cows) themselves. Same for "mutton" and sheep. The words for the end-products that the wealthy ate gained currency with the upper classes while the words for the animals from which the products were derived stayed in the lower classes.
 
  • #29
I remember my aunt teaching me to count when I was young. ichi, ni san shi go. She was Japanese.
 
  • #30
tribdog said:
I remember my aunt teaching me to count when I was young. ichi, ni san shi go. She was Japanese.
Itchy knees and she go.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K