Is Government Necessary for the Fulfillment of All Natural Desires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyle_soule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Government
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity and nature of government in fulfilling human desires. One viewpoint suggests that while an anarchist state might seem natural, a structured government is essential for achieving happiness and meeting natural desires, such as health and protection. The distinction is made between "natural desires," which are seen as needs, and "bad desires," which are viewed as wants. The conversation highlights the inherent challenges of governance, noting that while the ideals of government can be positive, the application often leads to oppression and power struggles. There is a call for a perfect form of government, envisioned as a true democracy where everyone has an equal voice, but it acknowledges the complexity of satisfying diverse human desires. The discussion reflects on the balance between freedom and the role of government in safeguarding that freedom while managing both good and bad impulses.
kyle_soule
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
Government ----> Good or Bad?

Let's take a look at Government from the natural desires point of view. Is Government necessary for the fulfillment of all ones natural (good) desires? Such as health, protection, etc.?

I used to think that an Anarchist state is the most natural state we can live in, as you would basically observe such ungovernered, through oppression and authority, states in nature. Then I took a closer look at the needs and differences of humans from other animals, and I concluded that a Government is, in fact, necessary in order for one to achieve happiness, in the sense of all ones naturals desires being met.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not so sure all those 'natural desires' ought to be met...
 
Originally posted by BoulderHead
I'm not so sure all those 'natural desires' ought to be met...

Natural desires are all those desires that are good, in those natural desires you will find eating and such. In the sense of the word I am using all the natural desires don't have to be met, but for happiness they ought to be met.

EDIT: Bad desires are wants, natural desires are needs, in a nutshell.
 
because the notion of 'good' you speak of is subjective, well, you can see what happens just by observing the politcal machines; One group against another trying to impose there own "authoritarian allocation of values" (to borrow a semi-famous quote) on their fellow man.
It's the story of the human race, pretty much.
 
Something from a Stuck Mojo song called "Declaration"

Some believe that it is the responsibility of government to provide for you. In truth, we form government to ensure and protect the freedom that is already inherently ours

Check out all the lyrics.

http://www.modernrocklyrics.com/S/stuckmojo_declarationofaheadhunter.php


I think the ideas behind government are good. But like anything that works perfect in theory, there are always problems when applied.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would also point out that an anarchist state covers "bad" impulses as well. You could kill a man out of anger, spite or jealousy- still only fullfilling your impulses, and not be punished for it.
 
Originally posted by Zantra
I would also point out that an anarchist state covers "bad" impulses as well. You could kill a man out of anger, spite or jealousy- still only fullfilling your impulses, and not be punished for it.

This is what I realized once I began to think of wants and needs and desires and such.

A perfect form of government, perhaps government in definition, is what I am addressing, of course government will become oppressive and power will cause many problems. Power is a 'bad desire' and it intervenes with good desires, so a power-hungry government isn't the form I speak of.
 
I believe the only perfect government would be a true democracy(and I don't mean the US) It would be one governed by the people equally, without a governing body, where everyone had an equal say, not one above anyone else. Of course not everyone would get their way, but you know what they say:

You can't please some all the people some of the time, Some of the people all of the time, but you can't please all the people all of the time.
 
Back
Top