Why do applied explanations sometimes seem more confusing than theoretical ones?

AI Thread Summary
Many individuals find "applied" explanations more confusing than "theoretical" ones, particularly in complex subjects like thermodynamics. Engineering textbooks often present concepts in a way that can be overwhelming, while theoretical texts, such as Schroeder's, may offer clearer insights. Personal experiences highlight this phenomenon, with examples like the Stern-Gerlach experiment illustrating how applied contexts can lead to confusion, prompting some learners to feel as if they must simply accept calculations without fully understanding the underlying principles. This discussion emphasizes the varying clarity of theoretical versus applied approaches in education.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Is it common to find the "applied" explanations more confusing than the "theoretical"

Is it common to find the "applied" explanations more confusing than the "theoretical" ones?

E.g. thermodynamics seems VERY confusing if I try to learn it from engineering textbooks, but VERY understandable if I try to learn it from Schroeder's book.

What personal examples do you guys have of this phenomena, if any?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


My first encounter with the Stern-Gerlach experiment confused the hell out of me. I basically assumed that magic occurred and that I best "shut up and calculate" as Feynman would say.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top