Is It Overprotective to Limit a Partner's Friendships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a relationship where one partner feels threatened by the girlfriend's friendship with a guy who has expressed romantic interest in her. Despite the girlfriend's reassurances of fidelity, the boyfriend's jealousy leads him to impose restrictions on her interactions with this friend, causing tension in their relationship. Forum contributors argue that the boyfriend's controlling behavior could push her closer to the other guy, suggesting that he should express his concerns respectfully rather than enforce limitations. They emphasize the importance of trust and communication, advising that if trust cannot be established, the relationship may not be sustainable. Ultimately, the situation highlights the complexities of boundaries and trust in romantic relationships.
  • #91
Mentallic said:
First of all, it was me and my mate that went to a strip club for the first time. And it was neither of our ideas, the opportunity popped into our minds when a bouncer offered us a cheap deal to get in.
But that's not the point of what I was trying to say. What I meant was that she had a problem with what I had done and said I should have called her about it before I went. At which point she would've told me she didn't want me to go and such.
We've both placed restrictions on each other at some point in our relationship, and I've never had a problem with it. Asking me to not be friends with a girl trying to hit on me is a given...

"First of all, it was me and my mate that went to a strip club for the first time."
("You'll be surprised what can happen when people act on instinct.")

if you were single, and not in a relationship--I think it would have been OK


"the opportunity popped into our minds when a bouncer offered us a cheap deal to get in."

cheap deal? that's your reason/excuse?


"At which point she would've told me she didn't want me to go and such."

relationships are built on trust through communication---so, you wanted to go, and didn't care if it would bother her, until you found out that it did bother her


"Asking me to not be friends with a girl trying to hit on me is a given."

nothing is a 'given'


If you want her, sit and talk --and apologize for not calling her first
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Mentallic said:
Oh, sorry, I misinterpreted your criticism for thinking that you aren't agreeing with me whatsoever.
For the record, I'm not particularly agreeing or disagreeing. Rather, I've been trying to point out how your words come across to a female.

I don't know you or your girlfriend or anything about how your relationship works or doesn't work. You may very well have real cause for concern about the direction that relationship is heading because of her "friendship" with this other guy. Sometimes that suspicion that they aren't telling you everything is spot on.

However, if you think the relationship is worth fighting to keep (if you are indeed competing with someone else), then you need to be careful how you approach expressing your concerns to your girlfriend. The way you describe the situation here sounds very controlling on your part (and she may be doing her share too...sometimes there is manipulation in both directions). If you're fighting to keep her, and your actions are pushing her away, I hope it's helpful for someone uninvolved to let you know why your actions or words are coming across badly so you can make adjustments. If it doesn't work out with this relationship, then learn from your mistakes to avoid them with the next one.
 
  • #93
IcedEcliptic said:
You are proposing that men and women cannot be platonic friends? I would need to see some heavily reviewed studies before I buy that line.
No, most of my friends are male and the relationships are platonic. The difference is that they are part of a larger group, if a male were to walk up to me and say "I want to be friends with you" I'm not naive enough to believe that it would stay platonic. If the situation were to come up, I'd hang out with a larger group of people and leave it at that. I'm not being paranoid, just realistic.
 
  • #94
Well...I was in the same situation before, but I was like how your girlfriend is. NOT FUN I can tell you that! Things is, human behaviour is so very hard for me to understand at times, so I am unsure if anything I can say about my situation will help at all-- everyone is so different! I just hope things work out for the best for all of you and I wish you some peace because I know it is an awful and maddening thing to be going through. If your girlfriend feels anything like how I did, I think she might be going crazy as well.

Best wishes!
 
  • #95
Are we defining platonic as a relationship in which there is no sexual attraction, or are we defining it as those urges are mutually not being acted on? I mean seriously. I am a guy and know that I can not be friends with an attractive women and not feel a sexual attraction to her. I don't think that is some sort of failure on my part, I think it is bilogical. That doesn't mean that I don't have girls who are friends, but in the past I have found that girls can be unaware or don't realize what this means. I would almost go as far as to say that it is impossible for me to be friends with a girl like I am friends with my best guy friends. If I found a girl I connected with like that I would be madly in love with her.
 
Last edited:
  • #96
I have two sisters who are both in college and their relationships are a constant source mental anquish for me.
They live together in a town house and between the two of them they have a harem of about twenty guys who are constantly around them. They float among these boys in what they think is a platonic fashion. They have only dated a select few. And of those few who they have broken up with none hang around anymore. I have been present for two unreturned professions of love and am aware of a handful of borderline stalkers (I say that in jest). They have one seemingly truly platonic friend who I have seen make no advances and behave in a truly friendly manner. I am just waiting for him to come over to the house with his boyfriend to confirm what myself and several others have already suspected (also said in jest, he is an honestly nice guy albeit very well dressed and has a few gayish tendencies, not limited to drinking rasberry vodka and wine coolers).

I say all this to show that in my personal experience that guys don't just hang out with girls they like. If they like them they will be sexually attracted to them and given the opportunity will act on them. I don't say this to be mean or to imply that it is in some way a bad thing. I just think that if girls could read minds they would be very very surprised. Either that or they would confirm what they had been denying to themselves.
 
  • #97
Pattonias said:
Are we defining platonic as a relationship in which there is no sexual attraction, or are we defining it as those urges are mutually not being acted on. I mean seriously. I am a guy and know that I can not be friends with an attractive women and not feel a sexual attraction to her. I don't think that is a some sort of failure on my part, I think it is bilogical. That doesn't mean that I don't have girls who are friends, but in the past I have found that girls can be unaware or don't realize what this means. I would almost go as far as to say that it is impossible for me to be friends with a girl like I am friends with my best guy friends. If I found I girl I connected with like that I would be madly in love with her.
That is my experience as well, I was convinced I could maintain a platonic friendship (non-sexual) with particular guys. I was convinced that if I said "no, we should stay just friends" that it would be possible, but it is not (in my experience). In some cases I was completely oblivious to the other intent and managed to get feelings hurt. I think zoobyshoe wrote an interesting post in another thread:

zoobyshoe said:
I don't know if I can explain it. It is a thing that seems to be completely foreign to women. Women seem to be very big on, at least, staying friends with guys they can't have, or who have broken up with them. They want to stay in close contact even if the guy is totally disinterested.

If I'm intensely interested in a woman, not being able to have her is torture. Imagine being famished and being invited to sit in presence of a fabulous meal you can't eat. The host of this meal seems inexplicably indifferent to the fact the sight and smell of this meal are driving you crazy, and seems to think you should be perfectly content to just look and smell.

This is a horrible situation: you being famished, and the host of the meal seeming not to get something so basic. Not only are you hungry, but you feel completely psychologically depersonalized. You would clearly be better off if the person hated you and wanted nothing to do with you in the future. Out of sight, out of mind. You need complete cold turkey to recover.

Women, for some reason I can't fathom, seem to decide it's preferable to stay friends with guys they're insane about who've rejected them romantically. I don't understand how they ever recover. In fact, it looks to me like they don't recover.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2702509&postcount=7
 
  • #98
Monique said:
That's just called being selfish. You can decide to live that way, but don't expect other people to be a victim of it...

Monique, what part of my post made you feel I expect anything from anyone ? Or how I made you would you feel a victim of my lifestyle (or anyone) ? By accepting the "you" , the theoretical women, can do anything, be what you want to be, do whatever you dream off ? Think a bit about it :devil:
Monique said:
A couple should not stay together because of ethics, they should stay together because they respect each other.

Good. Respect,in the wild, will never keep a couple together. Its a fairy tale. What keeps a couple together is accomplishment for both, on multiple planes. Starting with social and economical demands, and ending with sex.

Monique said:
Many people have testified that it's not possible for a girl to "just be friends" with a guy, I've tried it a long time ago and it indeed doesn't work.

And what part of my posts made you feel I advertise man-women friendship ? Can you find any post where I promote a man -women friendship ? I promote choice, as opposed to 2 penny whining on ethics .

Monique said:
GeorginaS made some good points, tell her how you feel so that she can be sensitive to your feelings.

Monique, isf there is anything you think I should tell to Georgiana about my feelings send me a PM :P i was never aware till now that Georgiana has to be soft on my little puppy soul. Thanks for tip, anyway.

This is ridiculous. If you have anything to tell me, do it directly, don't involve Georgiana.
 
  • #99
Um, I was adressing the OP with the last comment.
 
  • #100
Monique said:
Um, I was adressing the OP with the last comment.

Good. Then i'll present you my apologies for the misunderstanding. Please accept them.
 
  • #101
rewebster said:
Think of it another way, would you go with her to a 'male' strip club?

This would be gay with capital G. :devil:
 
  • #102
Monique said:
No, most of my friends are male and the relationships are platonic. The difference is that they are part of a larger group, if a male were to walk up to me and say "I want to be friends with you" I'm not naive enough to believe that it would stay platonic. If the situation were to come up, I'd hang out with a larger group of people and leave it at that. I'm not being paranoid, just realistic.

I believe you, this makes a great deal more sense.
 
  • #103
DanP said:
This would be gay with capital G. :devil:

I took that challenge from some female friends, along with two other lads and I. You are right, it was mostly a lot of gay men, and women out for a laugh. There is a HUGE difference between male and female stripping, for better or worse. I am not homophobic, but I found the situation deeply awkward. I don't know how a completely straight women could possibly find a female strip club anything but awkward as well, at best.
 
  • #104
DanP said:
and ending with sex.

Isn't that where everything ends:rolleyes:
 
  • #105
DanP said:
Good. Respect,in the wild, will never keep a couple together. Its a fairy tale. What keeps a couple together is accomplishment for both, on multiple planes. Starting with social and economical demands, and ending with sex.

I'm not sure I understand this comment specifically addressing the function of respect in a relationship. Can you explain this better to me, please?
monique said:
GeorginaS made some good points, tell her how you feel so that she can be sensitive to your feelings.

DanP said:
Monique, isf there is anything you think I should tell to Georgiana about my feelings send me a PM :P i was never aware till now that Georgiana has to be soft on my little puppy soul. Thanks for tip, anyway.

I'm pretty sure that that comma in the sentence Monique wrote was supposed to be a period. Punctuation misunderstanding.

DanP said:
Monique, isf there is anything you think I should tell to Georgiana about my feelings send me a PM :P i was never aware till now that Georgiana has to be soft on my little puppy soul. Thanks for tip, anyway.

This is ridiculous. If you have anything to tell me, do it directly, don't involve Georgiana.

I get the impression from this that you may have taken offense to something I wrote. If so, want to address it with me?
 
  • #106
Monique said:
No, most of my friends are male and the relationships are platonic. The difference is that they are part of a larger group, if a male were to walk up to me and say "I want to be friends with you" I'm not naive enough to believe that it would stay platonic. If the situation were to come up, I'd hang out with a larger group of people and leave it at that. I'm not being paranoid, just realistic.

Really? A woman can't hang out with a male except in a group without it becoming non-platonic? I'd have to disagree with that. I have many male friends, and have done things with them just one at a time as well as in groups. This has never changed the relationship to non-platonic.

Though, I think it is somewhat related to age and relationship status. When I was younger and totally unattached, sure, if an unattached male spent time with me solo and not part of a group, it generally led to non-plantonic-ness. But that's because we were both at an age and stage of life where we were looking for people to form romantic relationships with.

Now, I'm comfortably in a long-term relationship and it doesn't even cross my mind to think about attraction when doing things solo with other men other than my boyfriend. Of course, if they're feeling something they aren't sharing, I have no control over that, but most of the ones I'd just go out with alone are such long-time friends that they're almost like brothers to me.
 
  • #107
Mentallic, I've been thinking about this while barbecuing more meat than my cat and I can possibly eat for dinner. I should have invited people over.

Anyway, I've been thinking about this, and it made me feel a little sad that you get the impression or feeling that people here are against you or are not on "your side". As a number of people have pointed out, here, it's not about "sides". I can only speak for me, (which stands to reason and is self-evident) but I'd like you to know that even though it sounds as if I'm not on your side, I am. I am because I care enough to talk to you about behaviour that you're telling us about that you may not have thought through entirely. I care enough to try and talk to you about realities of relationships between men and women. I care enough -- meaning I'm taking your side enough -- to try and help you look at what's going on and see a little more clearly.

The only person you are responsible for and whose actions you can control in this situation are yours. That's it. That's so important to learn.

I entirely understand how it doesn't feel that way in some relationships or when experiencing first love relationships in life. You can experience feelings so deep and so intense about another person that when they do things that hurt you, you feel threatened, and it can even make your stomach feel sick. (I hope you understand Metallic, when I'm using the word "you" in these sentences, I mean "you" in the generic sense, and I'm not trying to say that I know how you, personally, are feeling or thinking.) Their actions may haunt your dreams and disturb your sleep. You care about that person so much, and it's so difficult to understand how they can possibly hurt your feelings. You want to make them stop causing you hurt or confusion. It's intense. It's gut-wrenching. So you make demands, because they mean so much to you. I understand all of that and all of those feelings. I've walked in those shoes.

Because I've walked in those shoes (or very similar ones), and because I know how much it hurts and how confusing it is, I'm on your side trying to tell you something. You can only control your behaviour. You only "own" you. You can do your level-best in a relationship and the person you're with can wander off with someone else. All you can do is your best. If she goes away with someone else, then you have to accept that she's a free agent, she's her own person, and it's going to hurt, but you can't stop it. You ask what you should do, just "sell her off to the highest bidder"? Again, she makes those choices for herself, not you. You make choices for yourself.

That's not me being against you or not on your side. That's me being totally on your side trying to help you find a place where you feel more comfortable. That's it.
 
  • #108
Moonbear said:
Really? A woman can't hang out with a male except in a group without it becoming non-platonic? I'd have to disagree with that. I have many male friends, and have done things with them just one at a time as well as in groups. This has never changed the relationship to non-platonic.

Though, I think it is somewhat related to age and relationship status. When I was younger and totally unattached, sure, if an unattached male spent time with me solo and not part of a group, it generally led to non-plantonic-ness. But that's because we were both at an age and stage of life where we were looking for people to form romantic relationships with.

Now, I'm comfortably in a long-term relationship and it doesn't even cross my mind to think about attraction when doing things solo with other men other than my boyfriend. Of course, if they're feeling something they aren't sharing, I have no control over that, but most of the ones I'd just go out with alone are such long-time friends that they're almost like brothers to me.
I have experiences that prove it otherwise, so I might be biased. I thought I had platonic male friends, who I would talk to on a daily basis and hang out with. The moment I began seriously dating my boyfriend they completely disappeared out of my life and would not even return the simplest communication. I've also been in a relationship and have other guys wanting to be "friends". It's what let me believe that it is just not possible. Of course it is OK to hang out once in a while, but you wouldn't do that every day and hang on the telephone all night right?
 
  • #109
Monique said:
I have experiences that prove it otherwise, so I might be biased. I thought I had platonic male friends, who I would talk to on a daily basis and hang out with. The moment I began seriously dating my boyfriend they completely disappeared out of my life and would not even return the simplest communication. I've also been in a relationship and have other guys wanting to be "friends". It's what let me believe that it is just not possible. Of course it is OK to hang out once in a while, but you wouldn't do that every day and hang on the telephone all night right?
It depends on the men. Many men feel that they can not have a "platonic relationship" with a woman. They seem to think that any activity with a woman that is not potentially leading to sex is a waste of time. I think that many women derive their views on "platonic relationships" from the belief and/or experience that men seem to just want to be friends when they think they have a shot at sex. So it would seem that it just requires a man that does not think any interaction with a woman ought to potentially lead to sex and a woman who is not uncomfortable with the fact that either of them may be attracted to the other.

As far as a male and female being friends and neither of them being at all attracted to the other, I think that it is highly unlikely (not counting a gay man and lesbian, though I am fairly certain that most straight women with gay friends are attracted to them).
 
  • #110
GeorginaS said:
I'm not sure I understand this comment specifically addressing the function of respect in a relationship. Can you explain this better to me, please?

It was a direct response to this:

couple should not stay together because of ethics, they should stay together because they respect each other.

No couple on this world should stay together because they respect each other. Respect is not enough to make any relation work. No person should waste its life staying in a relationship where there is only respect. Move on, find someone else and make him/her happy.

GeorginaS said:
I get the impression from this that you may have taken offense to something I wrote. If so, want to address it with me?

Its cool. You'll know if what you say bothers me . Nothing did so far.
 
Last edited:
  • #111
I read through this topic. It made me think of an ancient card I've been saving. (I guess as a *straight* WOMAN I tend to save stuff?:smile:) I love this card! It's an antique. Very beautiful.

The card has a beautiful woman walking through a field of tulips and daffodils. Printed on this antique card is the following:

THE TWELVE AVENUES OF BLISS

AVENUE FIVE

The FIFTH AVENUE OF BLISS traverses
the cliffs of comfort. It's the pleasure
of the womanly nature to provide
comfort and solice to the dampened
manly spirit.
:smile:

Honestly, I have a lot of friends that are male and female. They are *my* friends and I am their friend. Over the years we consider each other to be like a sister or brother.:smile: It's nice to have a big family that sticks together when times are good or not so great. Plain and simple, love has no closed door for those whom you care for.
 
Last edited:
  • #112
ViewsofMars said:
I read through this topic. It made me think of an ancient card I've been saving. (I guess as a *straight* WOMAN I tend to save stuff?:smile:) I love this card! It's an antique. Very beautiful.

The card has a beautiful woman walking through a field of tulips and daffodils. Printed on this antique card is the following:

THE TWELVE AVENUES OF BLISS

AVENUE FIVE

The FIFTH AVENUE OF BLISS traverses
the cliffs of comfort. It's the pleasure
of the womanly nature to provide
comfort and solice to the dampened
manly spirit.
:smile:

Honestly, I have a lot of friends that are male and female. They are *my* friends and I am their friend. Over the years we consider each other to be like a sister or brother.:smile: It's nice to have a big family that sticks together when times are good or not so great. Plain and simple, love has no closed door for those whom you care for.


Family is awesome, yes. Especially very close families. At the end of the day, no matter the disagreements you have with your family, your kin will always be there for you and support you.

[PLAIN]http://images.goantiques.com/dbimages/QGV9567/QGV956709.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #113
Monique said:
I have experiences that prove it otherwise, so I might be biased. I thought I had platonic male friends, who I would talk to on a daily basis and hang out with. The moment I began seriously dating my boyfriend they completely disappeared out of my life and would not even return the simplest communication. I've also been in a relationship and have other guys wanting to be "friends". It's what let me believe that it is just not possible. Of course it is OK to hang out once in a while, but you wouldn't do that every day and hang on the telephone all night right?
I think you've realized something a fair percentage of women never seem to fathom. Whenever a guy is actively friendly toward a girl there is always an element of sexual attraction to it.

It always surprises me when I find a girl doesn't realize a given guy, who she thinks is merely being friendly, is actually attracted to her. As a guy, I can spot the signs a mile away. In general I find that most women are twice as sensitive to body language and paralanguage than most men, yet this seems to be a fairly common blind spot in that sensitivity. I often wonder why. I suspect, sometimes, they're not really blind to it, but are so overwhelmed by how prevalent it is they have formed a kind of mental callous around it where they've lost feeling.
 
  • #114
zoobyshoe said:
It always surprises me when I find a girl doesn't realize a given guy, who she thinks is merely being friendly, is actually attracted to her. As a guy, I can spot the signs a mile away. In general I find that most women are twice as sensitive to body language and paralanguage than most men, yet this seems to be a fairly common blind spot in that sensitivity. I often wonder why. I suspect, sometimes, they're not really blind to it, but are so overwhelmed by how prevalent it is they have formed a kind of mental callous around it where they've lost feeling.

Its not blindness. IMO, its called not caring. And it happen a lot of man as well. There where women interested in me and I never realized until I was told by a 3rd party, or directly by them after a long time. Why ? Because I never looked at them as a potential sexual partner, I didn't cared to see anything of this nature. It's simply so unimportant that you don't bother and take for granted other things.

I think none should be surprised by this behavior in **both** man and women. When attraction is not reciprocal, we simply don't care enough to see. We are actively engaged in much more important pursuits to spend any attention span on something which doesn't mean anything to us.

In hindsight, it's always easy to see the signs. But then when it happens, you simply don't see them because you don't care.

zoobyshoe said:
Whenever a guy is actively friendly toward a girl there is always an element of sexual attraction to it.

this is not really true. I am pretty friendly, even actively, towards many women. The wives of some of my friends, the girls in the local mountain rescue team, some co-workers from my previous jobs and so on, friends of my gf. It's because I'm a social animal and I enjoy society, not because I necessarily want to screw them.

Friends, true friends,with bonds forged over decades of common history, i have very few. They are all males. But there is a lot of blur between friends and acquaintances, and this area is populated with persons of both sexes for me and in continuous flux.
 
Last edited:
  • #115
Char. Limit said:
I'm starting to wonder what some of these people think about relationships. Inferring from the comments that "she's her own person, you can't own her, let her do what she wants", is it then true that I can sleep with as many women as I want who are not my girlfriend, and if she gets angry, I can then say "you don't own me, I'm my own person"? Excellent... oh, and if this is not actually true, then you are applying a double standard, saying women should be praised for straying (Mentallic's girlfriend), while men should be vilified for the same thing (examples? pick 'em). I don't support a double standard.
Don't confuse disapproval with Mentallic's reactions to approval of his girlfriend's behaviour. He has good reason to be concerned. His possessive mentality is hindering communication in his relationship. He doesn't want to respect her wishes. He wants to dictate them. He doesn't want to set his own boundaries and be prepared to feel the pain of standing by his decisions. He wants to set her boundaries to avoid feeling the pain of having to stand by his own.

She is her own person. He doesn't own her. She can always do what she wants. She could sleep with as many men as she wants who are not her boyfriend. If that doesn't cross her boyfriend's boundaries then there isn't a problem. If it does, then he has to make the choice to tolerate the disrespect, or to abandon the relationship. It's a simple choice, but the consequences are sometimes tough.

TheStatutoryApe said:
It depends on the men. Many men feel that they can not have a "platonic relationship" with a woman. They seem to think that any activity with a woman that is not potentially leading to sex is a waste of time. I think that many women derive their views on "platonic relationships" from the belief and/or experience that men seem to just want to be friends when they think they have a shot at sex. So it would seem that it just requires a man that does not think any interaction with a woman ought to potentially lead to sex and a woman who is not uncomfortable with the fact that either of them may be attracted to the other.

As far as a male and female being friends and neither of them being at all attracted to the other, I think that it is highly unlikely (not counting a gay man and lesbian, though I am fairly certain that most straight women with gay friends are attracted to them).

Attraction isn't the same thing as sexual intent. I'm not sure if you were implying that comparison from one paragraph to the next. I have one female friend who is not attracted to me, nor me to her, and we get along quite well without physical attraction. Of course, I can't speak for her interests with complete certainty.

Usually though, I would say you are right. Where there is a male/female friendship, at least one is attracted to the other. However, the path that relationship takes to being non-platonic isn't guaranteed by the attraction even if they are both attracted to each other.

I knew a woman several years ago when I was in school. We were both attracted to each other. She started wearing her wedding ring to class, but continued to flirt with me. She even once mentioned that she would cheat on her husband, but would never leave him. When she said that I lost a great deal of respect for her. If she would hurt the person that she loves most, it would be foolish for me to trust her as a friend. Similarly, if I were in a relationship, I wouldn't want to hurt the person I loved because I felt some physical urge for another. It's not worth pursuing even if my partner never discovered the infidelity. It would reduce the happiness I would receive from my existing relationship. A single, straight person not in any relationship might see things differently. For some, a good relationship is more valuable than casual sex, and worth protecting.
 
  • #116
DanP said:
Its not blindness. IMO, its called not caring...

...In hindsight, it's always easy to see the signs. But then when it happens, you simply don't see them because you don't care.
It doesn't surprise me a guy would miss it for whatever reason. It surprises me in girls because I'm otherwise always impressed by how sensitive and reactive they are to body language and paralanguage.

this is not really true. I am pretty friendly, even actively, towards many women. The wives of some of my friends, the girls in the local mountain rescue team, some co-workers from my previous jobs and so on, friends of my gf. It's because I'm a social animal and I enjoy society, not because I necessarily want to screw them.
What I'm saying is that when a woman finds a man actively trying to "make friends" with her
she can be confident there's an element of sexual attraction. (Of course there will be cases where there are obvious other ulterior motives, like if she's his boss and he's sucking up to get a raise, or he wants to borrow money, or if there's some social advantage to be gained by being her friend.)
 
  • #117
Age brings a lot of experience into focus...
 
  • #118
I think in this thread we have been switching back and forth between the crudeness of wanting a hook-up when befriending a girl and the wanting of a relationship. The attraction to a person doesn't just exist on the sexual level. You may want the psychological intimacy that you receive from a real relationship. If you out for that with a women and it is not returned, it is painful and you don't want to put yourself in a position to repeatedly be hurt. That is why it can be difficult to remain friends after that line is crossed.
This is deeper than the attempt at a sexual advance that is rejected. In that case you are simply moving on to the next possibility.
 
  • #119
zoobyshoe said:
It doesn't surprise me a guy would miss it for whatever reason. It surprises me in girls because I'm otherwise always impressed by how sensitive and reactive they are to body language and paralanguage.


What I'm saying is that when a woman finds a man actively trying to "make friends" with her
she can be confident there's an element of sexual attraction. (Of course there will be cases where there are obvious other ulterior motives, like if she's his boss and he's sucking up to get a raise, or he wants to borrow money, or if there's some social advantage to be gained by being her friend.)
For me, it's because I wish to believe that men might find me interesting as a person and seek out my friendship, but you're right, most of the time the man ended up making that final awkward move and tell me they wanted a romantic relationship, or they just disapeared.

I think in a lot of male/female "friendships", one of them feels an attraction and the other doesn't. So this brings up 2 possible scenarios. Either the one that doesn't feel an attraction assumes the other person doesn't either, or they assume the other party is attracted and (unfeeling party) enjoys it, knowing it will always be one sided.
 
  • #120
Huckleberry said:
Attraction isn't the same thing as sexual intent. I'm not sure if you were implying that comparison from one paragraph to the next. I have one female friend who is not attracted to me, nor me to her, and we get along quite well without physical attraction. Of course, I can't speak for her interests with complete certainty.

Usually though, I would say you are right. Where there is a male/female friendship, at least one is attracted to the other. However, the path that relationship takes to being non-platonic isn't guaranteed by the attraction even if they are both attracted to each other.

I do not mean "sexual intent" if you mean an intention to have sex with the person, just perceiving the person in a sexual context. Obviously if you are friends with anyone you are "attracted" to them. The only difference is when that person is of the gender you prefer you may perceive them sexually which will colour your attraction.

The first time someone told me about this idea I first thought it was silly but as I thought about it I realized that I was definitely attracted to the majority of my female friends and that I was not really sure if those I was not attracted to might be attracted to me. I even found out recently that a gay friend of mine from high school had a crush on me. I see it everywhere. I have had several people tell me that they have utterly "platonic" relationships but in every case where I actually knew the person to whom they referred I knew it was not true. The only exceptions I have found have been relationships that were 'cemented' over long periods of time or influenced by cultural norms (such as family* and cases of large age differences).

* a cousin of mine and I had huge crushes on each other when we were younger but got over it because we were cousins. We eventually confessed to one another and then found out a few years later that we are not even blood related. :-/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K