Is it possible ( term symbols )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Livethefire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols Term
Livethefire
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to calculate the energy of a state from an atomic term symbol? Or are we only able to use the lande inteval rule to find spin orbit interaction splittings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In principle: yes, that is possible (with accuracy vs time tradeoffs).

In practice: Somewhat depends on the state. What you'd do is fire up your favorite multi-reference quantum chemistry program (Molpro or Molcas, most likely) and ask it to do a state-averaged MCSCF and MRCI+Q calculation of the states you are interested in, followed by a spin-orbit CI. It might take some effort, however, to convert the term symbols into state specifications these programs would understand (they are for molecules, after all), and high lying excited states might be difficult to lock onto or to converge

Also, if you're interested in heavy elements (say, Uranium or something) you might be better off with a 4-component program like DIRAC.
 
Wow that's a detailed answer, ha, I was expecting something a bit more elementary. I mean If I have a light element, hydrogen, helium or lithium for example.

And a term symbol like doublet S (1/2), is it posible by hand to figure out the energy? As opposed to estimations by computers? I mean, in this cause we would know S= 1/2, L=0, but no information of n. So by a bohr/schrodinger approach, I can't see any way to calculate the state energy.
 
Livethefire said:
Wow that's a detailed answer, ha, I was expecting something a bit more elementary. I mean If I have a light element, hydrogen, helium or lithium for example.

And a term symbol like doublet S (1/2), is it posible by hand to figure out the energy? As opposed to estimations by computers? .

For H: probably yes
For He: a good estimate might be possible. But not without months of work.
For Li and up: definitely no

The problem is that in order to obtain the state energy, the many-body Schroedinger equation must be solved in an at least approximate way. For more than four electrons[1], this can in practice only be done by some self-consistent field approximations, followed up by correlation calculations (in the latter the interaction between the electrons is directly taken into account). While it may be possible to get an estimate of the state energy without actually solving the Schroedinger equation, the accuracy of such estimates may not be sufficient to, say, obtain the correct state ordering, because for obtaining this in some elemets correlation must be taken into account.

[1] For two--four there are some cheats, but they can also not be done without a computer.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top