The discussion centers around the proposition that a fundamental physics law could be "Everything is in motion," exploring the implications of this idea, particularly in relation to black holes and the concept of zero in nature.
Participants do not reach consensus on the existence and role of zero in nature, nor on the implications of everything being in motion. Multiple competing views remain regarding these concepts.
Some statements reflect confusion over the definitions and implications of zero, as well as the basic principles of motion and force in physics, indicating a need for clearer foundational understanding.
Everything IS in motion. All motion is relative and everything is in motion relative to SOMETHING, but we hardly need a "law" to say that.andrecoelho said:
This is just word salad as far as I can tell. Or, put another way:andrecoelho said:
True, in the limited sense of the natural numbers, which you did not specify in your original post, which had to do with motion, which measurement rarely approximates a natural number.andrecoelho said:
ooops forgot :)hmmm27 said:
You need to learn some physics. This is just rambling, ungrammatical nonsense.andrecoelho said:
Ok.... but since everything moves, (i checked wikipedia), then everything is subject to a force , and applying a force?PeroK said:
GADS! NO! You really need to learn some VERY basic physics. Maybe start with Newton's Laws at least.andrecoelho said:
I know our academic institutions have come under fire, but ...andrecoelho said:
PF Medic here, stopping the bleeding. Thanks all for trying to help the newbie.andrecoelho said: