Is it possible to build a mobile linear amp for a walkie talkie?

AI Thread Summary
Building a mobile linear amplifier for a walkie-talkie to enhance communication from a near-space balloon is feasible, but requires careful consideration of FCC regulations regarding GMRS radios. A linear amplifier can improve range, but optimizing the antenna design, such as using a quad helix for better gain, is crucial due to potential signal interference from balloon movement. It's essential to ensure that the balloon's transmitter can be turned off if it drifts into restricted areas, such as Canada or Mexico. Additionally, all transmissions must be easily understandable and comply with FCC rules to avoid legal issues. Overall, pursuing an amateur radio license may provide more flexibility and options for this project.
tackyattack
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
So, my goal is to be able to take two walkie talkies and put one of them on a near space balloon and have a microcontroller send data through the walkie talkie on the balloon down to the one on earth. I'm not sure it would reach all the way back to Earth so I thought of putting a small linear amplifier on the balloon walkie talkie to increase the range. But I have no idea how to build one that would work with a walkie talkie. Any ideas on how I could build one?

Here is the walkie talkies incase it helps: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001UE6MIO/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You might want to look into Amateur Radio. You can legally do this as this club has:

http://www.arhab.org/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Instead, I'd optimize the antenna situation. Having line-of-site communications is a great advantage, but you'll likely have all manner of tossing and rotation. Thus, I'd be tempted to attempt circular polarization.
On the ground, a quad helix would give you considerable gain without becoming a pencil beam. From what I've read, they're fairly simple to build and can feed the 50 ohms or so that you'll likely need. You might look under "wi fi quad helix" for ideas.
Oh yes, don't forget to insulate it. The top of the world can be a chilly place.

- Mike
 
Before you get too far along with your plans you should review the FCC Rules for GMRS radios. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=604cc032b6ac0ad96ca79eab6219ca27&rgn=div5&view=text&node=47:5.0.1.1.5&idno=47#47:5.0.1.1.5.1

Here are some excerpts:
§ 95.3 License required.
Before any station transmits on any channel authorized in the GMRS from any point (a geographical location) within or over the territorial limits of any area where radio services are regulated by the FCC, the responsible party must obtain a license (a written authorization from the FCC for a GMRS system).

§ 95.101 What the license authorizes.
(a) A GMRS license authorizes a GMRS station to transmit messages to other GMRS stations at any geographical location within or over the territorial limits of any area where radio services are regulated by the FCC.
This means that if the balloon drifts over Canada or Mexico, or any other country, you must stop transmitting and that means having a means of turning off the balloon transmitter.

§ 95.183 Prohibited communications.
(a) A station operator must not communicate:
(4) Coded messages or messages with hidden meanings (“10 codes” are permissible);
This means that the meaning of your transmissions must be easily understandable to anyone listening on an ordinary receiver. The FCC wants to be sure your transmission is not being used for any illegal activity. You can't just send data.

dlgoff is correct, ham radio is your best bet and it's not that hard to get a license (even I have one).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh and if you believe you can just do it without a license and without getting caught, this is interesting reading.

http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0404/DOC-305523A1.txt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have a read through this - My school achieved a ridiculous range, I'm pretty sure it details radio comms somewhere there: http://www.hexoc.com/pages/apex/apex-ii.php

Edit: Here is the technical document specifying data transmissions: http://balloon.hexoc.com/media/apextech.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top