Is It Possible to Do Photometry Without Using a CCD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ccd Photometry
AI Thread Summary
Differential photometry on magnitude 5 and under stars can be explored using alternatives to CCDs, although CCDs are inexpensive and effective. Photomultiplier tubes like the 1p21 are affordable but necessitate costly high-voltage power supplies. Single photodiodes and photoresistors are considered for their potential as low-cost detectors, though concerns about their sensitivity to faint starlight are raised. The discussion highlights that while photodiodes have historical use, CCDs or area detectors are preferred for their efficiency in capturing both target and comparison stars in one image. Overall, exploring unconventional detectors may not yield sufficient sensitivity for practical applications in photometry.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
CCDs are very cheap, but I was wondering if there was an even cheaper alternative to CCDs if the goal is differential photometry on magnitude 5 and under stars. The data only needs enough precision to prove/demonstrate the concept, and to develop a good sense of the workflow in doing photometry from observational data. Assume I have a 6" Newtonian.

Photomultiplier tubes such as the 1p21 can be found for less than 40$, but require expensive 1000V power supplies.

I am more curious about single photodiodes, or even more crude ways of collecting starlight such as photoresistors. Just wondering if anyone has experimented with some off the beaten path electronic detectors.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mishima said:
I am more curious about single photodiodes, or even more crude ways of collecting starlight such as photoresistors. Just wondering if anyone has experimented with some off the beaten path electronic detectors.

I would suggest that their sensitivities would be way too low for the faintness of starlight
 
A photoresistor could not even detect something like Vega? Just curious, not sure how to calculate something like that using a datasheet.

I was thinking photodiodes at least had been in use a few decades ago.
 
It is much simpler to do differential photometry with an area detector where the target and comparison star can be on the same image. You can use a DSLR or even a point and shoot camea if it can do long exposures.
Regards Andrew
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top