Is it possible to get rid of the B field entirely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter idea2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    B field Field
idea2000
Messages
99
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I was wondering if it is possible to use only relativity and the E field to describe the force that a moving charge feels next to a wire with a steady current in it. Is the concept of the B field necessary? It seems like if we transform into the frame of the moving point charge, we will see length contraction, which leads to the positive charges in the wire appearing to be denser than the negative charges flowing through the wire, but what about in the laboratory frame? In the laboratory frame, the wire appears to be neutral, whether there is current flowing in it or not, so is it possible for the laboratory frame to explain the force on the moving charge without having to use the B field?

Thanks in advance for any help anybody can provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you will find that if E>B (in gaussian units) then this can be done, while if B>E, one cannot transform to any Lorentz frame in which there is no B field.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top