Is it true that magnets forced into opposition lose magnetic their force?

AI Thread Summary
Clamping two permanent magnets together with like poles (N to N or S to S) does not cause them to lose their magnetic power. Evidence from electric motors shows that permanent magnets maintain their magnetism despite being subjected to opposing forces. Additionally, even in diamagnetism, a permanent magnet's attraction to like magnets remains unaffected over time, provided the Curie temperature is not reached. When two magnets are placed in attraction mode, it is akin to splitting a single magnet in half, which does not diminish their individual magnetic properties. Overall, the consensus is that permanent magnets retain their magnetism regardless of how they are positioned relative to each other.
wmingin
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Good morning wise friends!

Its a cold morning here in southern New Jersey, my Labrador Retreiver (Mocha) is at my feet and we're expecting snow tomorrow. (I love snow, makes me appreciate the spring!)

O.K., the question.

I have heard that two permanent magnets clamped together N to N or S to S will lose their magnetic power. Is this true, and can anyone explain why?

If true, does the same effect occur when the magnets are placed in attraction mode?

May you all have good health and happiness always...

Bill
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wmingin said:
Good morning wise friends!

Its a cold morning here in southern New Jersey, my Labrador Retreiver (Mocha) is at my feet and we're expecting snow tomorrow. (I love snow, makes me appreciate the spring!)

O.K., the question.

I have heard that two permanent magnets clamped together N to N or S to S will lose their magnetic power. Is this true, and can anyone explain why?

If true, does the same effect occur when the magnets are placed in attraction mode?

May you all have good health and happiness always...

Bill
Clamping two magnets together won't degrade their magnetizm. Evidence: the magnetizm of the permanent magnets in electric motors never lose their magnetizm, even though they are subject to constant and repeated magnetic opposition forces (torque). Also, in diamagnetism, the magnet in situ is exposed to a continuous repulsion, yet a permanent magnet's ability to attract like-magnets is never diminished with respect to time (assume Curie temperature is never reached).

Two magnets placed in "attraction mode" is the same thing as taking a single magnet and breaking it in half.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top