Is J(R) the Intersection of All Maximal Ideals in R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsang
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the Jacobson ideal J(R) of a unital ring R, defined as the set of elements a in R such that 1 - ra is a unit for any r in R. The task is to show that J(R) is an ideal in R.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the definition of an ideal by considering elements of the form 1 - ra and 1 - rb, but struggles to demonstrate that their sum and product with other elements maintain the required form for J(R).
  • Another participant suggests that to show a + b is in J(R), it is necessary to prove that 1 - r(a + b) is a unit, raising questions about the implications of the unit condition.
  • A third participant discusses a partial proof involving units and suggests a potential path forward, but encounters difficulties in connecting their findings to the ideal's definition.
  • One participant proposes that it might be easier to show that J(R) is the intersection of all maximal ideals, indicating a different approach to the problem.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement and the definitions of ideals and units in ring theory, with some uncertainty about how to effectively utilize the information given about units in their proofs.

tsang
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R be a unital ring. Define J(R)={a \in R| 1-ra is a unit for any r \in R}

Show that J(R) is an ideal in R. (It is called the Jacobson ideal of R)


Homework Equations


I is ideal of ring R
, then I satifies
a+b \in I \forall a,b \in I

ra \in I \forall r \in R

The Attempt at a Solution



I've been trying to use direct definition by having two elements 1-ra, 1-rb \in J(R), then I tried to do (1-ra)+(1-rb) and hope to end up another element which has format 1-rc, but I couldn't get it.

Similarly, I let some x \inR, then try to compute x(1-ra), hope can end up format 1-ry, so it can satisfy second condition of being an ideal of ring R, but I still cannot get that format.<br /> <br /> Unless I haven't use information that 1-ra is unit to help me solve the problem. But not quite sure how to use this bit information.<br /> <br /> Can anyone please help me with this question? Thanks a lot.<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1-ra is not in J(R), a is. If a and b are in J(R), 1-ra and 1-rb are units - you need to prove that 1-r(a+b) is a unit as well to show that a+b is contained in J(R)
 
Hey I have also been working on this problem- got as far as showing that if ua and ub \in R such that ua(1-ra) =1=(1-ra)ua
and ub(1-rb) =1=(1-rb)u then ubua(1-r(a+b))=1.

But (1-r(a+b))ubua=(1-raub)a\neq?1

Does anyone have suggestions on how to go from here?
 
It might be easier to show that J(R) is the intersection of all maximal ideals. This is not hard to show.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K