Is K2(Pt(CN)4Br0.3).3H2O an Example of Anisotropic Metallicity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sojourner01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Property
Sojourner01
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
I have a pictorial example in a book here of a solid that behaves very strangely indeed. I would have called it 'biaxial metallicity' but I have no idea what the correct term is - the material is apparently metallic in one direction but not in another - that is, appears to obey the free or nearly-free electron model only in one direction. It's described as 'KCP' and given the formulation (K2(Pt(CN)4Br0.3).3H2O). I haven't been able to find this anywhere else. Anyone have any idea what this stuff is and have any more sources for information?

Oops, I should have mentioned the book. It's Elliot, The Physics and Chemistry of Solids.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This sounds like Krogmann salt (or Krogmann's salt).

This does usually consist of linear chains of transition metal ions like platinum ions with metal-metal bonds, which are surrounded by non-metal ligands.
As the metal-metal bonds are directed, this leads to metal-like conductivity in one direction and to bad conductivity in the other direction.

Anyway this is just stuff some guys in our university did some research on. I am not an expert on this topic myself.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top