mc2_phy
- 12
- 0
why is it a derived quantity?
The discussion revolves around whether kinetic energy (KE) is considered a derived quantity in the context of dynamics. Participants explore the definitions and implications of derived units, the challenges of measuring energy, and the relationship between energy and momentum.
Participants express differing views on the conservation of energy versus momentum and the implications for the classification of kinetic energy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of energy conservation and its practical applications in dynamics.
Participants highlight the challenges of defining and measuring energy, as well as the implications of these challenges for its classification as a derived unit. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum.
Specifying and choosing base units is a minefield.mc2_phy said:why is it a derived quantity?
Jupiter6 said:Energy is not conserved like momentum is and it should not be relied on alone in real-world calcs. So given that, I'd call energy a double-derived unit.
Drakkith said:What do you mean? Energy isn't conserved at all, or it's conserved differently than momentum?
sophiecentaur said:He's right, in as far as Momentum stays as Momentum but KE is not conserved and can turn up as thermal, electrical etc. which makes it much less useful for dynamics questions, for instance.