Is KE a Derived Quantity in Dynamics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mc2_phy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether kinetic energy (KE) is considered a derived quantity in the context of dynamics. Participants explore the definitions and implications of derived units, the challenges of measuring energy, and the relationship between energy and momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that kinetic energy is a derived quantity because its unit, the joule, is defined in terms of base units (kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²).
  • Others discuss the complexities involved in selecting base units, noting that energy is difficult to measure, which contributes to its classification as a derived unit.
  • One participant suggests that energy, being the integral of momentum, introduces a constant that complicates its status as a derived unit.
  • There is a claim that energy is not conserved in the same way as momentum, with kinetic energy potentially transforming into other forms such as thermal or electrical energy, which raises questions about its utility in dynamics.
  • Another participant emphasizes that kinetic energy is less useful for dynamics questions due to its non-conservation compared to momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of energy versus momentum and the implications for the classification of kinetic energy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of energy conservation and its practical applications in dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of defining and measuring energy, as well as the implications of these challenges for its classification as a derived unit. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum.

mc2_phy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
why is it a derived quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


From wiki on SI Derived Unit:

The International System of Units (SI) specifies a set of seven base units from which all other units of measurement are formed, by products of the powers of base units. These other units are called SI derived units, for example, the SI derived unit of area is square metre (m2), and of density is kilograms per cubic metre (kg/m3). The number of derived units is unlimited.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_derived_unit

Energy is derived since the joule's base units are kg⋅m2⋅s−2.

SI Base Units are: metre for length (US English: meter)
kilogram for mass (note: not the gram)
second for time
ampere for electric current
kelvin for temperature
candela for luminous intensity
mole for the amount of substance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_base_unit
 


mc2_phy said:
why is it a derived quantity?
Specifying and choosing base units is a minefield.
Do you ask your question this because you feel it is so important that it should be a base unit?
There's nothing sinister about the reason. All the quantities we use in Science are related and there's nothing particularly special about some, more than others. However,the base units are chosen mainly because they are relatively easy to measure and to specify reliably. Energy is a particularly hard thing to measure so it would not be an easy base unit to use. You would have to have a standard bucket of coal in Paris, a mass at the top of a high tower, somewhere to use as the standard or, a more modern version which involved the photons of a particular emission from a particular atom. Those examples may seem ridiculous but I can't think of a convenient alternative that a system of measurement could be based on.

Even mass is a difficult unit to specify and has relied on some arbitrary lumps of Platinum as standards. It is only recently that alternative ways of specifying the mass unit have been developed - involving counting atoms of a specific isotope of a specified element. ".wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram"
 
Last edited by a moderator:


By definition it's a derived unit because of what Drakkith wrote. Even something as simple as speed is a derived unit.

Keep in mind though that energy is the integral of momentum, so there is a constant that goes missing.

Energy is not conserved like momentum is and it should not be relied on alone in real-world calcs. So given that, I'd call energy a double-derived unit.
 


Jupiter6 said:
Energy is not conserved like momentum is and it should not be relied on alone in real-world calcs. So given that, I'd call energy a double-derived unit.

What do you mean? Energy isn't conserved at all, or it's conserved differently than momentum?
 


Drakkith said:
What do you mean? Energy isn't conserved at all, or it's conserved differently than momentum?

He's right, in as far as Momentum stays as Momentum but KE is not conserved and can turn up as thermal, electrical etc. which makes it much less useful for dynamics questions, for instance.
 


sophiecentaur said:
He's right, in as far as Momentum stays as Momentum but KE is not conserved and can turn up as thermal, electrical etc. which makes it much less useful for dynamics questions, for instance.

Ah I see.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K