Is Kinetic Energy Really Constant in Constant Velocity Motion?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Muhammad asad
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am really confused here. I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero. But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible. What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object. Please! someone correct me if I am wrong here.
 
on Phys.org
Muhammad asad said:
I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero.
That's right. The net work must include all work done on the body, including the work done by gravity.

Muhammad asad said:
But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible.
Note that the net work is still zero.

Muhammad asad said:
What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object.
Nothing wrong with that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Muhammad asad
Thanks a lot. Really appreciate your help