Is Kinetic Energy Really Constant in Constant Velocity Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy remains constant during constant velocity motion, indicating that the net work done on the object is zero. However, when an object moves upward at constant velocity, its gravitational potential energy (g.p.e) increases despite no change in kinetic energy. This occurs because the positive work done to lift the object is balanced by the negative work done by gravity. The energy transferred in lifting the object is stored as g.p.e. Understanding this balance clarifies the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in such scenarios.
Muhammad asad
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am really confused here. I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero. But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible. What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object. Please! someone correct me if I am wrong here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muhammad asad said:
I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero.
That's right. The net work must include all work done on the body, including the work done by gravity.

Muhammad asad said:
But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible.
Note that the net work is still zero.

Muhammad asad said:
What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object.
Nothing wrong with that.
 
  • Like
Likes Muhammad asad
Thanks alot. Really appreciate your help
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top