Is lead salvaged from hospital x-ray shielding safe?

AI Thread Summary
Lead salvaged from hospital X-ray shielding is considered safe for repurposing in ammunition casting, as X-rays do not leave residual radiation. The shielding material, typically found in walls, does not become radioactive from exposure to X-rays. However, it is important to remember that while the lead itself is not radiologically hazardous, it is still lead, which poses its own health risks. Caution is advised when handling and using lead in any form. Overall, the lead from X-ray shielding is deemed safe for use in bullet casting.
John Covert
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I am a lay person, so the physics lesson would only confuse me.

I do reloading of ammunition for competitive shooting (Cowboy Action Shooting).
I have someone offering to sell lead for melting and casting bullets. He has indicated its source was shielding from hospitals used in X-ray shielding applications. I do not believe it came from aprons, but rather from walls enclosing the X-ray rooms.

My question is, is it safe to use for this repurposing, or should it be considered "hot"?

Thanks in advance for any help.
John
 
Science news on Phys.org
John Covert said:
My question is, is it safe to use for this repurposing, or should it be considered "hot"?

it's safe

X-rays don't leave any residual radiation emission

X-rays are just EM radiation like light ... just a higher frequency and more energeticDave
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Primordial_Coridal and russ_watters
Thank you, Dave.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
... But don't trust any offers of depleted Uranium ...
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Primordial_Coridal and russ_watters
Is lead salvaged from hospital x-ray shielding safe?

Well, it is still lead.

John Covert said:
melting and casting bullets

And they're still bullets. So "safe" is relative. But if you are asking is they are radiologically safe, x-rays don't make materials radioactive.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top