Is Magnetism Capable of Bending Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dragoneyes001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism Space
AI Thread Summary
Magnetism does not significantly bend space in the same way gravity does, primarily due to the equivalence principle, which states that only mass affects spacetime curvature. While magnetism can influence space in very small amounts through its energy contribution to the energy-momentum tensor, this effect is typically negligible compared to gravitational forces. The discussion references Theodor Kaluza's unified field theory, which attempts to connect electromagnetism and gravity but does not directly address the bending of space by magnetism. The idea of describing magnetism through a tensor theory similar to gravity is explored, suggesting that magnetic monopoles would not follow the same geodesic unless their mass and pole strength are identical. Overall, the consensus is that while magnetism has some effect on space, it is minimal and not comparable to gravitational influence.
dragoneyes001
Messages
216
Reaction score
23
this is not a school project its trying to find some answer or paper on: if magnetism can or can not bend space.

the closest theory that I've found is:

Theodor Kaluza (1885-1954) attracted the attention of the physical community since 1921 with his unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism in five dimensions.

yet there still seems to miss the question I'm trying to find some answer for "does magnetism bend space?" most papers I come across barely skim magnetism and switch over to how gravity affects space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnetism doesn't be space, but gravity does.
 
This is due to he equivalence principle. If magnetism was subject to the equivalence principle then it would curve spacetime, however it is not.
 
Well, magnetism DOES bend space, but only in very very tiny amounts. After all, the energy contained in the magnetic field contributes to the energy-momentum tensor, which is proportional to the Ricci curvature tensor (that's Einstein's equation).
But the energy content in a magnetic field is usually so small (as compared to the energy equivalent, say, of a block of lead), that its gravitational coupling is unmeasureable.
 
I think the question was aimed at 'is there a way of describing magnetism through a tensor theory' in a similar fashion to gravity. While mass is made up of all the interaction energies in a body including the magnetic and thus appears in Einstein's field equation it is the collective property of mass which determines spacetime curvature.

If a similar argument was proposed for magnetismthen two magnetic monopoles would not follow the same geodesic in a magnetic field unless their mass and the strength of the pole is the same with the same sign.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top