Is Math a Tool for Understanding Our World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matt010nj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
matt010nj
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Math "language"

Is mathematics a science that was created in order to describe our physical world and its phenomenons or independent science that simply co-exists with others?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Mathematics is the root and basis of all sciences, from physics to sociology. They are dependant on it, and it depends on only itself.
 


From a very strict point of view, however, mathematics is NOT a "science" itself. By "very strict" I mean defining a science as based on the "scientific method":
1. Observe and experiment
2. From the observations, develop as many theories as possible
3. From the theory predict results of additional experiments
4. Do the experiments to eliminate those theories that predicted incorrect results
5. Repeat

(Mathematics is only really used in part (3) of that.)

Mathematics is not a science in that it does not depend upon the results of experiments. More simply put, science depends upon inductive logic while mathematics depends upon deductive logic.

In fact, I would go further. Science, because of its insistence upon correspondence with the result of experimentation, is necessarily based on a "Realistic" philosophy while mathematics, insisting on a logical progression from axioms, is necessarily based on an "Idealistic" philosophy.
 


Science tends to work on the principles of deduction and experiment.

Math tends to work on the principles of induction and proof.

There's no hard line, though. Actual math requires a lot of experimenting. "If I take this set and apply this operation, the result looks like this. What if I apply the operation twice? Three times? Oh hey, a pattern! Now let's find a proof for the general case." Good science is always supported by good math, and great theories are often based on the simplest mathematical model that fits the evidence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top